Comparison of Two Types of General Anesthesia, Venous versus Inhalatory, regarding the Risk of Renal Injury after Videolaparoscopic Obesity Surgery
Phase 4
- Conditions
- Acute renal failure, morbid obesityC18.654.726.500.700C12.777.419.780.050
- Registration Number
- RBR-8wt2fy
- Lead Sponsor
- Adriano Teixeira Fernandes
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Data analysis completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
Inclusion Criteria
morbidly obese patients, scheduled for video laparoscopic bariatric surgery; both gender; age between 18 and 65 year.
Exclusion Criteria
volunteers with lung disease; heart failure; renal failure; cancer of any etiology; patients on chronic corticosteroid use; that are not available to participate in all stages of the study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Intervention
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Expected primary outcome - Difference of 33% on average values of serum lipocalin 2 (NGAL) during the perioperative period of video laparoscopic bariatric surgery between the two groups of general anesthesia;Observed primaryoutcome - We did not find significant differences in serum lipocalin between the groups for general anesthesia during the procedure
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Expected secondary outcomes - Change in the rate of acute renal injury, evidenced by clinical and laboratory markers (urine output and serum creatinine, translated into RIFLE criteria) in the perioperative period of laparoscopic bariatric surgery according to the type of anesthesia used;Secondary outcomes observed - We did not find significant differences in the rates of acute kidney injury defined by clinical and laboratory criteria (RIFLE criteria) between the two groups of general anesthesia in the perioperative period of laparoscopic bariatric surgery