Comparison of Respiratory Support for Acute Pulmonary Edema
Not yet recruiting
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Edema - Acute
- Registration Number
- NCT06820112
- Lead Sponsor
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
- Brief Summary
This study is a retrospective study. The demographic and vital signs of patients with acute pulmonary edema are retrospectively collected to compare the prognosis of patients after receiving different respiratory support.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 200
Inclusion Criteria
- diagnosis of acute pulmonary edema
Exclusion Criteria
- Under 18 years old
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method death rate 28 days
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What biomarkers predict response to non-invasive ventilation vs. high-flow oxygen in acute pulmonary edema?
How do BNP/NT-proBNP levels correlate with respiratory support efficacy in NCT06820112 patients?
What adverse events are associated with CPAP vs. BiPAP in acute pulmonary edema observational studies?
How does ACE inhibitor use modify outcomes in acute pulmonary edema with different respiratory modalities?
What molecular pathways link fluid overload to respiratory support response in NCT06820112 cohort?