To compare the efficacy of immediate placing of implant after tooth removal vs delayed placement of implant after 2 months of tooth removal using blood derived concentrates.

Phase 3

Not yet recruiting

• Conditions: Disorder of gingiva and edentulousalveolar ridge, unspecified,

• Registration Number: CTRI/2025/04/085686
• Lead Sponsor: Government Dental college and Research InstituteBangalore

Brief Summary

Alveolar bone resorption that occursafter tooth loss yields diminished alveolar ridge dimensions.Alveolar ridgepreservation(ARP)) aids the surgeon in achieving optimal placement of implantwith desired implant diameter while maintaining the aesthetics of overlyingtissues. To overcome this Immediate installation at the time ofextraction offers potential advantages for both practitioners and subjects. Itallows a decrease in treatment time and may result in an increase in subjectsatisfaction.Some clinicians have argued that immediate implant installationmay prevent alveolar bone resorption and thus decrease the need for boneaugmentation procedure. Other‘s have questioned such benefits and highlightedthat immediate implant placement at the time of tooth extraction is associatedwith an increase in surgical complications and may result in suboptimalaesthetic outcomes . Theapplications of platelet concentrate seem to enhance stability of implants andhave been used for socket preservation and along with immediate implantplacement.Hence this study is designed with the aim to istocompare efficacy of Immediate Implant Placement versus Delayed ImplantPlacement following Socket Preservation using PRF.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Last Update Posted: 2025-04-25
• Study Start: 2025-10-05

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Not Yet Recruiting
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 24

Inclusion Criteria

• Male and female subjects of >24 yrs of age Single non restorable tooth.
• Thick gingival biotype,Adequate bone volume for the placement of immediate implant- D2and D3,An intact socket wall following extraction – Class 1 (kim 2020).

Exclusion Criteria

• History of any systemic disease.
• Medications that might affect bone turnover as bisphosphonates,Smokers,Any signs of any acute infection at the surgical site or the adjacent natural teeth,External or internal resorptions,Severe periodontal destruction at the site of implant placement,Pregnancy and lactation.

Study & Design

• Study Type: Interventional
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
1)Marginal bone loss and Horizontal width is measured between the groups as assessed by CBCT is set as the primary outcome	at baseline , 4 months post implant placement

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
1.Soft tissue healing index [Landry R, Turnbull Rand Howley T, 1988].	To asses pink esthetic score (PES)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Government Dental College and Research Institute, Bangalore; 🇮🇳 Bangalore, KARNATAKA, India

Government Dental College and Research Institute, Bangalore

🇮🇳Bangalore, KARNATAKA, India

Dr MOHAMMED ABRAR ARSHAD

Principal investigator

7019458602

drabrar114@gmail.com