MedPath

The Use of Bupivacaine and Ropivacaine for Sciatic Nerve Block

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
The Duration of Motor Block May Vary Between 12-36 Hrs
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT01272921
Lead Sponsor
Northwestern University
Brief Summary

The duration of motor block for infragluteal parabiceps sciatic nerve block following total knee replacement may vary between 12-36 hrs depending on the amount of local anesthetic given.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
142
Inclusion Criteria
  • Adult patients (>18 years of age) who are undergoing elective total knee arthroplasty will be included in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Exclusion criteria for the study are patient refusal to be included in the study, contraindications to regional anesthesia, history of allergy to amide local anesthetics, the presence of a progressive neurological deficit, the presence of coagulopathy or infection, or pregnancy

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
BupivacaineBupivacaineVarying does to determine duration of analgesia following a sciatic nerve block
RopivacaineRopivacaineVarying does to determine duration of analgesia following a sciatic nerve block
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Duration of Motor and Sensory Block of the Sciatic With 0.5% Bupivacaine and Ropivacaine After Ultrasound-guided Nerve-stimulator-Assisted Needle Positioning Beneath the CIEL3 days

Subject reported and investigator measured motor and sensory blockade of the sciatic nerve with less than 10ml of 0.5% bupivacaine and ropivacaine after ultrasound-guided nerve-stimulator-assisted needle positioning beneath the common investing external layer (CIEL).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Cumulative Probabilities for Needle Positioning Above and Below CIEL.1 Day

The cumulative probability distributions for the minimal current to evoke a motor response with the needle tip positioned external (above) to the common investing extraneural layer (CIEL) and the cumulative probability distribution for the needle tip postioned internal (below) to the CIEL were sought. The difference in the mean minimum threshold current (mA) for the external (above) and internal (below) CIEL positioning were calculated.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Northwestern University, Feingberg School of Medicine

🇺🇸

Chicago, Illinois, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath