MedPath

Refinement and Assessment of New Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologies for Neurological Exams

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Nervous System Diseases
Interventions
Procedure: MRI
Registration Number
NCT00739518
Lead Sponsor
University of Michigan
Brief Summary

This study is being done to assess new Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) technologies such as new hardware or software designed to improve MRI examinations of the brain, spine head and neck regions.

Detailed Description

This study is being done to assess new Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) technologies such as new hardware or software designed to improve MRI examinations of the brain, spine, and head \& neck regions.

Software and hardware are constantly being improved, new machines replace old machines, software is updated and improved as are the devices used to produce better MRI images.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
500
Inclusion Criteria
  • If you are a male or a non-pregnant female patient
  • Normal volunteer
  • presenting to MRI for a clinically-ordered neurological or head and neck MRI exam
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients, who have electrically, magnetically or mechanically activated implants such as heart pacemaker, magnetic surgical clips, prostheses or implanted neurological stimulator.
  • Pregnant patients or patients who are lactating.
  • A patient who is claustrophobic

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
MRI scan - new technologyMRIThe patient's clinical MRI scan will also utilize some new technology, such as a change in software or additional MRI sequences
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Improvement in quality of MRI studies in Neuroradiology1 year

Specific Measurement Are:

1. Scan speed - is the new method as fast or faster than regular method(s)

2. Signal to noise - Subjectively, or quantitatively do we get the same, better, or new contrast compared to the regular methods(s).

3. Image contrast - Subjectively, or quantitatively do we get the same or better resolution compared to the regular method(s).

4. Spatial resolution - Subjectively, or quantitatively do we get the same or better resolution compared to the regular method(s).

5. Artifact - Subjectively, or quantitatively do we get the better artifact reduction compared to the regular method(s).

6. Ergonomics - Is the new software easier to work or offer more information more cleanly than the regular software

7. Patient comfort - Subjectively, does the new software and/or hardware make the patient's MRI experience more comfortable.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Michigan Health System

🇺🇸

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath