A Double Blind Study for the Treatment of Acute Ulcerative Colitis
- Registration Number
- NCT00350415
- Lead Sponsor
- Warner Chilcott
- Brief Summary
A Double-blind, Randomized, 6-week, Parallel-group Design Clinical trial to assess the Safety and Efficacy of Asacol 4.8 g/day (800 mg mesalamine tablet) versus Asacol 2.4 g/day (400 mg mesalamine tablet) for the Treatment of Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis (ASCEND III).
- Detailed Description
This is a double-blind, randomized, multi-center, multi-national, active-control study in patients who are experiencing a moderately active flare of UC. Patients will be randomly assigned to receive either Asacol 2.4 g/day (400 mg tablet) or Asacol 4.8 g/day (800 mg tablet) for 6 weeks. Patients will be randomized to one of the 2 treatment groups in a 1:1 ratio. The objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Asacol 4.8 g/day (800 mg tablet) compared to Asacol 2.4 g/day (400 mg tablet) in this patient population. Following successful screening, patients will be randomized to one of the two treatment arms. Patients will be evaluated after 6 weeks of treatment with an interim visit after 3 weeks.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 772
- Patients 18-75 years with a confirmed diagnosis of moderately active flare of ulcerative colitis.
- Female patients need to be postmenopausal or using adequate contraception.
- Patients with isolated proctitis
- Patients with comorbidities or an investigative or commercialized treatments confounding interpretation of study results or compromising patients' safety in the trial.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description 1 Mesalamine Asacol 2.4 g/day (400 mg tablet) 2 Mesalamine Asacol 4,8 g/day (800 mg tablet), oral, for 6 weeks
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Proportion of patients (ITT) in each treatment group who achieve treatment success, defined as symptomatic and endoscopic improvement from baseline at Week 6. Week 6
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Proportion of patients (ITT) in pre-defined subgroups in each treatment group who achieve treatment success, defined as symptomatic and endoscopic improvement from baseline at Week 6 and Week 3. week 3 and 6
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Research Facility
πΊπ¦Zaporizhzhya, Ukraine
Research FacilityPanevezys
π±πΉPanevezys, Lithuania