MedPath

A Double Blind Study for the Treatment of Acute Ulcerative Colitis

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Ulcerative Colitis
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT00350415
Lead Sponsor
Warner Chilcott
Brief Summary

A Double-blind, Randomized, 6-week, Parallel-group Design Clinical trial to assess the Safety and Efficacy of Asacol 4.8 g/day (800 mg mesalamine tablet) versus Asacol 2.4 g/day (400 mg mesalamine tablet) for the Treatment of Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis (ASCEND III).

Detailed Description

This is a double-blind, randomized, multi-center, multi-national, active-control study in patients who are experiencing a moderately active flare of UC. Patients will be randomly assigned to receive either Asacol 2.4 g/day (400 mg tablet) or Asacol 4.8 g/day (800 mg tablet) for 6 weeks. Patients will be randomized to one of the 2 treatment groups in a 1:1 ratio. The objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Asacol 4.8 g/day (800 mg tablet) compared to Asacol 2.4 g/day (400 mg tablet) in this patient population. Following successful screening, patients will be randomized to one of the two treatment arms. Patients will be evaluated after 6 weeks of treatment with an interim visit after 3 weeks.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
772
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients 18-75 years with a confirmed diagnosis of moderately active flare of ulcerative colitis.
  • Female patients need to be postmenopausal or using adequate contraception.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with isolated proctitis
  • Patients with comorbidities or an investigative or commercialized treatments confounding interpretation of study results or compromising patients' safety in the trial.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
1MesalamineAsacol 2.4 g/day (400 mg tablet)
2MesalamineAsacol 4,8 g/day (800 mg tablet), oral, for 6 weeks
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Proportion of patients (ITT) in each treatment group who achieve treatment success, defined as symptomatic and endoscopic improvement from baseline at Week 6.Week 6
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Proportion of patients (ITT) in pre-defined subgroups in each treatment group who achieve treatment success, defined as symptomatic and endoscopic improvement from baseline at Week 6 and Week 3.week 3 and 6

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Research Facility

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

Zaporizhzhya, Ukraine

Research FacilityPanevezys

πŸ‡±πŸ‡Ή

Panevezys, Lithuania

Β© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath