MedPath

MOMENTUM 3 IDE Clinical Study Protocol

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Advanced Refractory Left Ventricular Heart Failure
Interventions
Device: HeartMate 3 LVAS
Device: HeartMate II LVAS
Registration Number
NCT02224755
Lead Sponsor
Abbott Medical Devices
Brief Summary

The objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the HM3 LVAS by demonstrating non-inferiority to the HMII LVAS (HMII) when used for the treatment of advanced, refractory, left ventricular heart failure.

Detailed Description

The HM3 LVAS is intended to provide hemodynamic support in patients with advanced, refractory left ventricular heart failure; either for short term support, such as a bridge to cardiac transplantation (BTT) or myocardial recovery, or as long term support, such as destination therapy (DT). The HM3 is intended for use inside or outside the hospital.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1028
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Subject or legal representative has signed Informed Consent Form (ICF)

  2. Age ≥ 18 years

  3. BSA ≥ 1.2 m2

  4. NYHA Class III with dyspnea upon mild physical activity, or NYHA Class IV

  5. LVEF ≤ 25%

  6. a) Inotrope dependent OR b) CI < 2.2 L/min/m2, while not on inotropes and subjects must also meet one of the following:

    • On Optimal Medical Management (OMM), based on current heart failure practice guidelines for at least 45 out of the last 60 days and are failing to respond
    • Advanced Heart Failure for at least 14 days AND dependent on intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) for at least 7 days
  7. Females of child bearing age must agree to use adequate contraception

Exclusion Criteria
  1. Etiology of heart failure (HF) due to or associated with uncorrected thyroid disease, obstructive cardiomyopathy, pericardial disease, amyloidosis or restrictive cardiomyopathy

  2. Technical obstacles which pose an inordinately high surgical risk, in the judgment of the investigator

  3. Existence of ongoing mechanical circulatory support (MCS) other than IABP

  4. Positive pregnancy test if of childbearing potential

  5. Presence of mechanical aortic valve that will not be either converted to a bioprosthesis or oversewn at the time of LVAD implant

  6. History of any organ transplant

  7. Platelet count < 100,000 x 103/L (< 100,000/ml)

  8. Psychiatric disease/disorder, irreversible cognitive dysfunction or psychosocial issues that are likely to impair compliance with the study protocol and LVAS management

  9. History of confirmed, untreated AAA > 5 cm in diameter within 6 months of enrollment

  10. Presence of an active, uncontrolled infection

  11. Intolerance to anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapies or any other peri/post-operative therapy the investigator will require based upon the patients' health status

  12. Presence of any one of the following risk factors for indications of severe end organ dysfunction or failure:

    1. An INR ≥ 2.0 not due to anticoagulation therapy
    2. Total bilirubin > 43 umol/L (2.5 mg/dl), shock liver, or biopsy proven liver cirrhosis
    3. History of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) defined by FEV1/FVC < 0.7, and FEV1 <50% predicted
    4. Fixed pulmonary hypertension with a most recent PVR ≥ 8 Wood units that is unresponsive to pharmacologic intervention
    5. History of stroke within 90 days prior to enrollment, or a history of cerebrovascular disease with significant (> 80%) uncorrected carotid stenosis
    6. Serum creatinine ≥ 221 umol/L (2.5 mg/dl) or the need for chronic renal replacement therapy
    7. Significant peripheral vascular disease (PVD) accompanied by rest pain or extremity ulceration
  13. Patient has moderate to severe aortic insufficiency without plans for correction during pump implant

  14. Pre albumin < 150 mg/L (15mg/dL) or Albumin < 30g/L (3 g/dL) (if only one available) ; pre albumin < 150 mg/L (15mg/dL) and Albumin < 30g/L (3 g/dL) (if both available)

  15. Planned Bi-VAD support prior to enrollment

  16. Patient has known hypo or hyper coagulable states such as disseminated intravascular coagulation and heparin induced thrombocytopenia

  17. Participation in any other clinical investigation that is likely to confound study results or affect the study

  18. Any condition other than HF that could limit survival to less than 24 months

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
HeartMate 3 LVAS (HM3 LVAS)HeartMate 3 LVASEvaluation of the safety and effectiveness of the HeartMate 3 LVAS by demonstrating non-inferiority to the HMII LVAS (HMII) when used for the treatment of advanced, refractory, left ventricular heart failure.
HeartMate II LVASHeartMate II LVASEvaluation of the safety and effectiveness of the HeartMate 3 LVAS by demonstrating non-inferiority to the HMII LVAS (HMII) when used for the treatment of advanced, refractory, left ventricular heart failure.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Short Term Primary End PointThe first 294 randomized Subjects will be followed for 6 months or to outcome (transplant, explant, or death), whichever occurs first.

Survival at 6 months free of disabling stroke (Modified Rankin Score \> 3) or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device

Long Term Primary End PointThe first 366 randomized Subjects will be followed for 24 months or to outcome (transplant, explant, or death), whichever occurs first.

Survival at 2 years free of disabling stroke (Modified Rankin Score \> 3) or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Adverse Event RatesTwo years post-implant

Events-per-patient-year (EPPY) for anticipated adverse events as defined in the study protocol

Powered Secondary End Point: Pump Replacement at Two YearsAs they occur up to 24 months or to Outcome, whichever occurs first

In addition to powering the study on the primary endpoints for PMA approval, the study will pre-specify a powered secondary endpoint to evaluate incidence of pump replacements at 24 months. HeartMate II is the control.

EuroQoL 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L) Total ScoreBaseline to 24 months

Quality of Life as measured by EuroQoL 5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) total score. The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire has patients rate their quality of life across 5 categories of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The scores from the 5 dimensions are summed for the total score which ranges from 5 to 25 with higher scores indicating more problems and a worse quality of life.

EuroQol-5D-5L Visual Analogue ScaleBaseline to 24 months

Quality of life as measured by the visual analogue scale from the EuroQol-5D-5L questionnaire. The patient rates their current state of health with the visual analogue scale. The scale ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate a better quality of life.

Six Minute Walk TestBaseline to 24 months

Functional status as measured by the Six Minute Walk Test. The Six Minute Walk Test measures the distance a patient is able to walk during 6 minutes without running or jogging.

New York Heart Association (NYHA) ClassificationBaseline to 24 months

Functional status as measured by NYHA classification. NYHA class categorizes patients by the severity of their heart failure symptoms. As the class increases, the degree of symptoms is more severe indicating worse functional status. Class I indicates no limitation of physical activity. Class II indicates slight limitation of physical activity. Class IIIA indicates marked limitation of physical activity where less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or angina pain. Class IIIB indicates marked limitation of physical activity where mild physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or angina pain. Class IV indicates inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.

RehospitalizationsFrom initial discharge to two years post-implant

Rate of all cause rehospitalization

Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary ScoreBaseline to 24 months

Quality of Life as measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better quality of life and fewer heart failure symptoms.

Trial Locations

Locations (69)

University of Chicago Medical Center

🇺🇸

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Ohio State University Medical Center

🇺🇸

Columbus, Ohio, United States

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

🇺🇸

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Baptist Health Medical Center - Little Rock

🇺🇸

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

University of California, San Diego

🇺🇸

La Jolla, California, United States

Advocate Christ Medical Center

🇺🇸

Oak Lawn, Illinois, United States

Mt. Sinai Medical Center

🇺🇸

New York, New York, United States

Stanford University

🇺🇸

Stanford, California, United States

Columbia University Medical Center

🇺🇸

New York, New York, United States

Newark Beth Israel Medical Center

🇺🇸

Newark, New Jersey, United States

Carolinas Medical Center

🇺🇸

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

🇺🇸

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Sentara Norfolk General Hospital

🇺🇸

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Johns Hopkins Unversity Hospital

🇺🇸

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Massachusetts General Hospital

🇺🇸

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Cleveland Clinic Foundation

🇺🇸

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Sharp Memorial Hospital

🇺🇸

San Diego, California, United States

IU Health/Methodist Hospital

🇺🇸

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

University of Minnesota Medical Center, Fairview

🇺🇸

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

University of Utah Hospital and Clinics

🇺🇸

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

California Pacific Medical Center

🇺🇸

San Francisco, California, United States

Emory University Hospital

🇺🇸

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

🇺🇸

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Brigham & Women's Hospital

🇺🇸

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Spectrum Health Butterworth Hospital

🇺🇸

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Abbott Northwestern Hospital

🇺🇸

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Duke University

🇺🇸

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

🇺🇸

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

St. Thomas West Hospital

🇺🇸

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

🇺🇸

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Baylor Research Institute

🇺🇸

Dallas, Texas, United States

Memorial Hermann Health Systems

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

Texas Heart Institute

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

University of Washington Medical Center

🇺🇸

Seattle, Washington, United States

University of Rochester Medical Center

🇺🇸

Rochester, New York, United States

Allegheny General Hospital

🇺🇸

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

University Hospitals of Cleveland

🇺🇸

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

University of Virginia Medical Center

🇺🇸

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Methodist Houston

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

Inova Fairfax Hospital

🇺🇸

Falls Church, Virginia, United States

Bon Secours St. Mary's Hospital

🇺🇸

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Virginia Commonwealth University

🇺🇸

Richmond, Virginia, United States

University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics

🇺🇸

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Hershey

🇺🇸

Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

Shands Hospital @ University of Florida

🇺🇸

Gainesville, Florida, United States

MedStar Washington Hospital Center

🇺🇸

Washington, District of Columbia, United States

Piedmont Heart Institute

🇺🇸

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

University of Kentucky - Saha Cardiovascular Research Center

🇺🇸

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Ochsner Medical Center

🇺🇸

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

St. Vincent Hospital

🇺🇸

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Barnes Jewish Hospital

🇺🇸

Saint Louis, Missouri, United States

University of Michigan

🇺🇸

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Henry Ford Hospital

🇺🇸

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Mayo Clinic Rochester

🇺🇸

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Medical University of South Carolina

🇺🇸

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Sutter Memorial Hospital

🇺🇸

Sacramento, California, United States

Yale New Haven Hospital

🇺🇸

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Florida Hospital

🇺🇸

Orlando, Florida, United States

Tampa General Hospital

🇺🇸

Tampa, Florida, United States

INTEGRIS Baptist Medical Center

🇺🇸

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Jewish Hospital

🇺🇸

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

University of Nebraska Medical Center

🇺🇸

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

🇺🇸

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Oregon Health and Science University

🇺🇸

Portland, Oregon, United States

St. Luke's Medical Center

🇺🇸

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

University of Colorado Hospital

🇺🇸

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Cedars Sinai Medical Center

🇺🇸

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

🇺🇸

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Montefiore Medical Center

🇺🇸

Bronx, New York, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath