A Comparison of Medial Cervical Plexus Block Versus Combined (Superficial and Deep) Cervical Plexus Block for Carotid Endarterectomy: A Prospective, Randomized Single Blind Study
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Cervical Plexus Block Comparison
- Sponsor
- Daniel Nalos MD
- Enrollment
- 100
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Complications
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 13 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to compare efficacy, complications and safety of the standard method of Combined (superficial and deep) cervical plexus block (SDCPB) with Ultrasound guided Medial Cervical plexus block technique (MCPB).
Hypothesis: Ultrasound assisted MCPB is safer than SDCPB with similar efficacy.
Investigators
Daniel Nalos MD
Prim Daniel Nalos, MUDr., Head of Dept., Anaesthesiology and Critical Care
Masaryk Hospital Krajská zdravotní a.s.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients undergoing Elective Carotid Endarterectomy
Exclusion Criteria
- •Denied consent to block performance, Emergency procedure
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Complications
Time Frame: perioperative
number of additional applications of short-acting local anaesthetic
Time Frame: intraoperatively
The number of times a surgeon would have to supplement the Regional Block with intrafield application of increments of short-acting local anaesthetic
patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 24 h after operation