Investigating Usability of c-SIGHT in the Homes of Brain Injury Survivors

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Stroke; Spatial Neglect; Brain Injuries; Attention Deficit
• Interventions: Behavioral: c-SIGHT (computorized spatial innatention grasping home-based therapy)

• Registration Number: NCT03963661
• Lead Sponsor: University of East Anglia

Brief Summary

A brain injury can damage the brain, so that it no longer receives information about the space around one side of the world. If this happens, people may not be aware of anything on one side, usually the same side they also lost their movement (the most affected side). This severe condition is called spatial neglect. Currently there is no recommended diagnostic test or clinically-proven treatment for the condition. In a recent study, the investigators found a long-lasting reduction in neglect if people practiced picking-up an object with their unaffected hand. This intervention is called Spatial Inattention Grasping Home-based Therapy (SIGHT). It requires people to lift wooden rods of different lengths. Once a person is familiar with the task, they can practice on their own at a time convenient to them in their homes. The investigators have developed the first computerized version of SIGHT (c-SIGHT) as well as a novel diagnostic test for neglect using portable low-cost motion-tracking technology that can be used in the patient's home. In the proposed study, the investigators will investigate how usable and acceptable this technology is in people's homes. Stroke survivors (recruited from community settings) will undergo a 7-day self-led training at their homes with c-SIGHT. At the end of the intervention, 1:1 semi-structured interviews will be carried out with both stroke survivors and carers to investigate usability and acceptability of c-SIGHT. Moreover, spatial neglect, carer burden and motor function will be assessed pre- and post-completion of c-SIGHT.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2019-05-06
• Study First Submitted: 2019-05-20
• Study First Submitted QC: 2019-05-23
• Study First Posted: 2019-05-28
• Status Verified: 2019-08
• Last Update Submitted: 2019-08-07
• Last Update Posted: 2019-08-12
• Primary Completion: 2020-02-01
• Study Completion: 2020-04-03

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 10

Inclusion Criteria

• +18
• suffered brain injury
• have TV with around 2 meters in front of it to be able to run the therapy
• live in the Norfolk, Suffolk, Essex or Cambridgeshire (UK)
• no other pre-existing neurological disorders (such as dementia)
• no language impairment (able to follow 1-stage command)
• mental capacity to consent
• no known learning disability
• no major psychiatric illness
• no history of substance abuse

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: SINGLE_GROUP

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
c-SIGHT	c-SIGHT (computorized spatial innatention grasping home-based therapy)	SIGHT requires participants to grasp and lift rods with their less impaired arm.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT) conventional sub tests	Change from baseline (T0) to 7 days (pre-treatment baseline, T1) and from T1 to immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2)	Standardized measure of spatial inattention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Broken Hearts test from Oxford Cognitive Screening (paper version)	Change from baseline (T0) to 7 days (pre-treatment baseline, T1) and from T1 to immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2)	Standardized measure of spatial inattention
Catherine Bergego Scale	Change from baseline (T0) to 7 days (pre-treatment baseline, T1) and from T1 to immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2)	Standardized checklist to detect presence and degree of unilateral neglect during observation of everyday life situations. The scale also measures self-awareness of behavioral neglect (anosognosia).; The CBS uses a 4-point rating scale to indicate the severity of neglect for each item: 0 = no neglect; 1. = mild neglect (patient always explores the right hemispace first and slowly or hesitantly explores the left side); 2. = moderate neglect (patient demonstrates constant and clear left-sided omissions or collisions); 3. = severe neglect (patient is only able to explore the right hemispace); This results in a total score out of 30.; Azouvi et al. (2002, 2003) have reported arbitrary ratings of neglect severity according to total scores: 0 = No behavioral neglect 1-10 = Mild behavioral neglect 11-20 = Moderate behavioral neglect 21-30 = Severe behavioral neglect
Pinch and grip force task (dynamometer)	Change from baseline (T0) to 7 days (pre-treatment baseline, T1) and from T1 to immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2)	Measures upper limb function
Caregiver Burden Scale	Change from baseline (T0) to 7 days (pre-treatment baseline, T1) and from T1 to immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2)	To assess perceived burden among people caring for others with disabilities. There are 22 items in which the carer rates perceived burden from 0 (never) to 4 (nearly always).; A total score of 0 to 20 = little or no burden; 21 to 40 = mild to moderate burden; 41 to 60 = moderate to severe burden; 61 to 88 = severe burden.
Line bisection Test	Change from baseline (T0) to 7 days (pre-treatment baseline, T1) and from T1 to immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2)	Test for spatial inattention which measures spatial biases when marking middle of 10 20mm lines. Bisection error bigger that 6mm is considered evidence of spatial inattention.
Computerized extrapersonal neglect test (CENT)	Change from baseline (T0) to 7 days (pre-treatment baseline, T1) and from T1 to immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2)	Computerized test measuring ego and allocentric neglect sub types in extra personal space via television screen
Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL)	Change from baseline (T0) to 7 days (pre-treatment baseline, T1) and from T1 to immediately after 7 days of therapy (T2)	A patient-centered outcome measure intended to provide an assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) specific to patients with stroke. Patients must respond to each question of the SS-QOL with reference to the past week. It is a self-report scale containing 49 items in 12 domains. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate better functioning. The SS-QOL yields both domain scores and an overall SS-QOL summary score. The domain scores are unweighted averages of the associated items while the summary score is an unweighted average of all twelve domain scores.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of East Anglia; 🇬🇧 Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom