The Efficacy of Decision Support E-book for Reducing Decisional Conflict on Prostate Biopsy Decision Making in Patients With Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 110
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Decisional Conflict Scale
研究概览
简要总结
PURPOSE: This study is to test the efficacy of decision support E-Book for 1) increasing prostate biopsy knowledge and decision self-efficacy, and 2) reducing decisional conflict on prostate biopsy decision making in patients with elevated serum PSA.
DESIGN: The study is based on an experimental design. A convent sample of 110 adult males with a PSA greater than 4.0 ng/mL and the transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy suggested by a physician will be recruited from the urology clinics. Patients will be randomly assigned to the intervention and control group. The intervention group will receive the biopsy decision support intervention delivered by a nurse using an E-Book containing a comprehensive information about prostate biopsy. The control group will receive a health education about prostate biopsy. Data on biopsy knowledge, decision self-efficacy and decision conflict will be collected at pre and post test by using the study questionnaires.
ANALYSIS: Independent sample t -tests and chi-square tests will be used to compare the between group baseline equilibrium. Independent sample t -tests will be also used to analyze the between group differences in biopsy knowledge, decision self-efficacy, and decision conflict at post-test to evaluate the efficacy of the decision support intervention.
详细描述
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is the primary screening test for prostate cancer. The elevated PSA test result is usually followed by the transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) for further diagnosis. However, patients often have lots concerns while deciding whether or not to undergo a prostate biopsy. They may worry about the biopsy associated complications such as urinary tract infection, pain, hematuria, bloody stools, etc., causing damage to urinary tract or sexual function, diagnosed with prostate cancer, or cancer spreading. Some may even worry about that a cancer cell can be transmitted to a partner through sexual activity after a biopsy. All these can cause physiological stress and decisional conflict for the patients. Therefore, it is necessary to provide decision support measures in order to improve the patients' knowledge regarding the advantages and disadvantages of prostate biopsy, to increase their decision self-efficacy, and to decrease their decisional conflict, thereby to achieve the share decision making goal. However, few studies have examined the efficacy of decision aids on prostate biopsy decision making. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to test the efficacy of decision support E-Book for 1) increasing prostate biopsy knowledge and decision self-efficacy, and 2) reducing decisional conflict on prostate biopsy decision making in patients with elevated serum PSA.
The study is based on an experimental design. A convent sample of 110 adult males with a PSA greater than 4.0 ng/mL and the transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy suggested by a physician will be recruited from the urology clinics. Patients will be randomly assigned to the intervention and control group. The intervention group will receive the biopsy decision support intervention delivered by a nurse using an E-Book containing a comprehensive information about prostate biopsy. The control group will receive a health education about prostate biopsy. Data on biopsy knowledge, decision self-efficacy and decision conflict will be collected at pre and post test by using the study questionnaires. The study instruments include the prostate biopsy knowledge scale, the Decision Self-Efficacy Scale, and the Decisional Conflict Scale. Data on whether the patients received a prostate biopsy will also be collected from the patients' medical records.
Independent sample t -tests and chi-square tests will be used to compare the between group baseline equilibrium. Independent sample t -tests will be also used to analyze the between group differences in biopsy knowledge, decision self-efficacy, and decision conflict at post-test to evaluate the efficacy of the decision support intervention.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Supportive Care
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Care Provider)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 40 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- Male
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •aged between 40-80
- •PSA greater than 4.0 ng/mL
- •the transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy suggested by a physician
- •able to communicate in Mandarin or Taiwanese.
排除标准
- •had been diagnosed with prostate cancer
- •had been diagnosed with psychiatric diseases
- •with cognition impairments
研究组 & 干预措施
The intervention group
The intervention group will receive the biopsy decision support intervention delivered by a nurse using an E-Book containing a comprehensive information about prostate biopsy.
干预措施: Using an E-Book (Behavioral)
The control group
The control group will receive a health education about prostate biopsy.
结局指标
主要结局
Decisional Conflict Scale
时间窗: 1 hour after pre-test
There are 16 items in the scale. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0(strongly agree) to 4(strongly disagree). The mean of 16 items multiplied by 25 represent the total score. The possible of the total score for the scale ranges from 0 \[no decisional conflict\] to 100 \[extremely high decisional conflict\]. Scores exceeding 37.5 are associated with decision delay.
Prostate Biopsy Knowledge Scale
时间窗: 1 hour after pre-test
The scale measures patient's knowledge of prostate biopsy. There are 16 items in the scale. Each item is rated on dichotomy. The possible score for the scale ranges from 0 to 16. The higher values represent more knowledge of prostate biopsy patient have.
Decision Self-Efficacy Scale
时间窗: 1 hour after pre-test
There are 11 items in the scale. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0(not confident) to 4(a lot confident). The mean of 11 items multiplied by 25 represent the total score. The possible of the total score for the scale ranges from 0 \[not confident\] to 100 \[extremely confident\].
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Tsae Jyy, Wang
RN PhD Professor
National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences
