跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01684774
NCT01684774Unknown不适用

Comparison Between Ultrasound-guided and Landmark-guided Ankle Blocks

Hillel Yaffe Medical Center1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2012年12月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
100
试验地点
1
主要终点
Surgical Anesthesia Sufficient

研究概览

简要总结

The investigators will be comparing ultrasound-guided (USG) ankle block and anatomic landmark-guided (ALG) ankle block to determine which of these procedures is better in surgical anesthesia and in postoperative pain relief.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Control
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients undergoing orthopedic foot operation with osteotomy

排除标准

  • Skin infection near block injection site
  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • Coagulopathy with INR >1.

研究组 & 干预措施

I. USG

Patients receiving Ultrasound-guided Ankle Block

干预措施: Bupivacaine (Drug)

II. ALG

Patients receiving Anatomic Landmark-guided Ankle Block

干预措施: Bupivacaine (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Surgical Anesthesia Sufficient

时间窗: Thirty minutes

Sufficiency of surgical anesthesia will be determined by the presence of a complete sensory or motor block. If general anesthesia needs to be added to achieve operative analgesia, the surgical block will not be deemed sufficient.

Post-operative Pain Relief

时间窗: Twenty-four hours

Intensity of post-operative pain will be measured by a numerical scale from 0-10 by the patient

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other Gov
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Comparison Between Ultrasound-guided and... | 临床试验