Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01684774
NCT01684774
Unknown
Not Applicable

Comparison Between Ultrasound-guided and Landmark-guided Ankle Blocks

Hillel Yaffe Medical Center1 site in 1 country100 target enrollmentDecember 2012
ConditionsAnalgesia
InterventionsBupivacaine

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Bupivacaine
Conditions
Analgesia
Sponsor
Hillel Yaffe Medical Center
Enrollment
100
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Surgical Anesthesia Sufficient
Last Updated
13 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The investigators will be comparing ultrasound-guided (USG) ankle block and anatomic landmark-guided (ALG) ankle block to determine which of these procedures is better in surgical anesthesia and in postoperative pain relief.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
December 2012
End Date
December 2014
Last Updated
13 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients undergoing orthopedic foot operation with osteotomy

Exclusion Criteria

  • Skin infection near block injection site
  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • Coagulopathy with INR \>1.

Arms & Interventions

I. USG

Patients receiving Ultrasound-guided Ankle Block

Intervention: Bupivacaine

II. ALG

Patients receiving Anatomic Landmark-guided Ankle Block

Intervention: Bupivacaine

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Surgical Anesthesia Sufficient

Time Frame: Thirty minutes

Sufficiency of surgical anesthesia will be determined by the presence of a complete sensory or motor block. If general anesthesia needs to be added to achieve operative analgesia, the surgical block will not be deemed sufficient.

Post-operative Pain Relief

Time Frame: Twenty-four hours

Intensity of post-operative pain will be measured by a numerical scale from 0-10 by the patient

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials