MedPath

A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Types of Myofunctional Appliances

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Tooth Position Anomalies
Interventions
Device: Myofunctional appliance
Registration Number
NCT05371691
Lead Sponsor
University of Baghdad
Brief Summary

A randomized clinical trial is set out to compare the effectiveness of two types of functional appliances in the correction of a Class II malocclusion. (Class II malocclusions are where upper front teeth bite significantly further forward in relation to lower front teeth).

Detailed Description

It is a multicenter randomized clinical trial with two arms parallel group. The patients will be randomly divided into two groups, group one: Myobrace appliance will be used while, and group two Twin-block appliances will be used. Cephalometric x-ray will be taken before starting the treatment (T1) and at the end of treatment (T2) at 9 months. The effectiveness of the two appliances will be assessed and measured comparing the difference in the cephalometric X-ray before and after treatment.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Growing children who need myofunctional appliance.
  2. Cl II div. 1 malocclusion.
  3. No previous orthodontic or orthopaedic treatments.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Patients with systemic involvement.
  2. Congenital malformations such as cleft lip and palate.
  3. Facial deformities.
  4. Finger sucking habit will be excluded

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Twin-block groupMyofunctional applianceTwin-block appliance will be used for children who have Cl.II div.a malocclusion
Myobrace groupMyofunctional applianceMyobrace appliance will be used for children who have Cl.II div.a malocclusion
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Dentoskeletal changesT1 at the start of treatment and T2 at the end of treatment around 9 months

Evaluation of dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes following the treatment of growing children with myobrace and twin block appliances. Using cephalometric analysis to measure the angles including dental angles such as inter-incisal angle, in addition to skeletal angles such as SNA,SNB and ANB angles.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Soft tissue changesT1 at the start of treatment and T2 at the end of treatment around 9 months

2. Soft tissue changes using cephalometric radiographs including different angular measurement such as E-line and nasolabial angle (comparing the changes in the photographs at the beginning of the treatment and at the end of the treatment.

Patient satisfactionAt the end of treatment (around 9 months)

3.Patient satisfaction with both appliances will be investigated using a questionnaire at the end of the study (around 9 months)

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

College of Dentistry-University of Baghdad

🇮🇶

Baghdad, Al-Rusafa, Iraq

College of Dentisry-University of Baghdad

🇮🇶

Baghdad, Iraq

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath