Enhancing Spatial Navigation Using Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation
- Conditions
- Alzheimer's DiseaseMild Cognitive Impairment
- Interventions
- Device: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
- Registration Number
- NCT01958437
- Lead Sponsor
- VA Office of Research and Development
- Brief Summary
Remembering how to travel from one location to another is critical in everyday life, yet this vital ability declines with normal aging and can be further affected by conditions that disproportionately affect the elderly, such as vision loss or progressive dementia. Human and animal research has shown that two distinct memory systems interact during navigation. The first, referred to as allocentric navigation, is very flexible and uses spatial knowledge of key features or landmarks to develop and use a mental map of the environment. This approach involves brain regions that are critical for new learning and memory but that decline with age. The second, referred to as egocentric navigation, is inflexible and relies on "habit" memories that link specific features with specific directions. This approach relies on brain regions that are critical for "automatic" responses and that are relatively unaffected by age.
The main problem is that allocentric navigation declines with age and is accompanied increased dependence on egocentric navigation. This change increases the risk of becoming disoriented or "lost" when traveling in unfamiliar areas or even when traveling new routes in familiar areas. Therefore, the main goal of this project is to examine whether non-invasive brain stimulation, specifically transcranial direct current stimulation, can improve allocentric navigation in healthy older adults and patients with mild cognitive impairment.
Participants will complete two functional magnetic resonance imaging sessions while learning new environments. Before one of these sessions, participants will receive active brain stimulation over the parietal cortex. Before the other session, participants will receive sham brain stimulation over the parietal cortex. The effects of this stimulation will be evaluated using both an allocentric and an egocentric memory test. Physiologic effects will be evaluated using both task-based and resting-state MRI.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 44
General inclusion criteria (all participants):
- All medications stable for approximately 1-2 months;
- No history of severe mental illness;
- No current untreated alcohol or substance abuse/dependence;
- English as native and preferred language;
- MRI-compatible if taking part in fMRI studies
- Able to give informed consent.
MCI Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of amnestic MCI based on criteria set forth by Petersen (2004). Additionally, other potential causes of cognitive deficit ruled out by the referring physician;
Healthy older adults
- intact cognitive functioning as measured by neuropsychological testing
- History of neurological disease or injury
- History of severe mental illness
- Current untreated alcohol or substance abuse
- Other conditions may exclude; please discuss with contact
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Cognitively intact older adults - ACTIVE tDCS Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) Group receives active brain stimulation Cognitively intact older adults - SHAM tDCS Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) Group receives sham brain stimulation MCI ACTIVE tDCS Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) Group receives active brain stimulation MCI SHAM tDCS Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) Group receives sham brain stimulation
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Accuracy in Centimeters From Target Location for Allocentric Outcome assessed after each of 2 sessions (estimated within 1 week of each other) 1 active tDCS; 1 sham tDCS for each measure. Participants touched a screen (using a ELO 19" touchscreen monitor) to document the location of the landmark. The distance between the actual vs. selected location served as the dependent measure.
Egocentric Outcome assessed after each of the 2 sessions Number of turns correctly recalled for each egocentric environment
Hippocampal BOLD Signal During Task-based fMRI change between active and sham tDCS sessions (<1month) BOLD signal change comparing active to sham tDCS during Allocentric navigation (i.e., active HD-tDCS \> sham HD-tDCS). Activation maps thresholded at p\<.01 with minimum cluster size of 5 voxels.
Dorsal Attention Network Connectivity During Resting-state fMRI change between active and sham tDCS sessions (<1month) Change in resting state functional connectivity strength between active and sham tDCS sessions. Strength is measured by Pearson r correlations between nodes, which are z-transformed, and summated.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
🇺🇸Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur, GA
🇺🇸Decatur, Georgia, United States