Differences Between Long Distance Road Runners and Treadmill Runners in Achilles Tendon Structure
- Conditions
- Achilles Tendon Injury
- Registration Number
- NCT06294093
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Haifa
- Brief Summary
this study will investigate the structure of the Achilles tendon and functional tests in road runners compared to treadmill runners.
- Detailed Description
Healthy runners (road and treadmill runners) who run regularly at least twice a week for half an hour, over 80% of the training on the treadmill or road, will be recruited for the study.
All subjects will fill out a demographic questionnaire for personal details (age, sex, height, weight, past injuries, training). Each participant will undergo functional tests in random order: 1. Examination of the morphology of the Achilles tendon - will be examined by ultrasound tissue characterized (UTC) 2. Balance test - Y Balance Test 3. Proprioception test - AMEDA device 4. Muscle strength test - manual dynamometer for testing gastrocnemius muscle strength. 5. Gastrocnemius muscle endurance test - single leg heel raise test until fatigue.
A comparison will be made between the two study groups.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 50
- run regularly at least twice a week for half an hour,
- over 80% of the training on a treadmill or road
- pain or injury to Achilles tendon during the 6 months, preventing running for at least 3 days.
- past Achilles tendon surgeries,
- sprained ankle in the last six months,
- lower limb and back pain while running
- participants who report running with minimalist shoes.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method endurance test gastrocnemius muscle baseline number of single leg heel raise test until fatigue
Balance test baseline Y Balance Test - composite score: sum of 3 reach directions in centimeters divided by 3 times the limb length then multiplied by 100
muscle strength test baseline hand held dynamometer dynamometer assessment of Gastrocnemius muscle
ultrasound tissue characterized baseline percentage of type 1,2,3,4 fibers within the tendon
Proprioception test baseline AMEDA device - scores between 0 and 1, A higher score represents better proprioception ability.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
The Academic College at Wingate
🇮🇱Netanya, Israel