跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02980848
NCT02980848Unknown不适用

Comparative Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnostic Evaluation by Extent of Breast Density

University of California, Davis7 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 1,341,172 人开始时间: 2016年9月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
1,341,172
试验地点
7
主要终点
Patient Reported Outcomes (Aim 1)

研究概览

简要总结

This Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) ADVANCE study is a large, observational pragmatic comparative effectiveness research study using high-quality, prospectively collected data from BCSC registries to generate evidence on how breast density should be integrated into decision making around breast cancer screening and preoperative diagnostic work-up. We will augment existing BCSC registry infrastructure with additional prospective data collection and collection of patient reported outcomes (PROs), CISNET modeling of long-term screening outcomes, and qualitative data from focus groups with women represented in two aims.

详细描述

Aim 1: Compare the effectiveness of breast cancer screening using digital mammography alone versus digital mammography plus supplemental screening (digital breast tomosynthesis or MRI) by extent of breast density.

Sub aim 1: Evaluate whether the performance of tomosynthesis improves with years of experience, and whether any "learning curve" depends on radiologist specialty (i.e., breast imaging specialist vs. general radiologist).

Aim 2: Compare the effectiveness of preoperative MRI versus no MRI by extent of breast density among women with an initial, pathologically confirmed diagnosis of DCIS or invasive breast cancer.

Covid-19 Enhancement Aim and Hypotheses:

Develop patient-focused messaging content through focus groups that radiology facilities can use when scheduling appointments to inform women of the safety to schedule or postpone breast screening or diagnostic services.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 89 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Patient Reported Outcomes (Aim 1)

时间窗: Measured within one year post-screening

Patient surveys targeted to determining outcomes of interest to patients

Screening Harms: Recall rate (Aim 1)

时间窗: Within one year after screen

Number of positive screens divided by total number of screens

Screening Harms: Other consequences (Aim 1)

时间窗: Within one year after screen

Number of DCIS diagnoses within 1 year of a positive screen divided by total number of screens, reported overall and by grade

Screening Failures: Interval or advanced breast cancer rate (Aim 1)

时间窗: Within one year after screen

Number of invasive cancer cases within 1 year of a negative screen divided by total number of screens Number of advanced cancers (stage IIB or higher) within 1 year of a screen divided by total number of screens

Screening Benefits: Rate of early stage invasive cancer detection (Aim 1)

时间窗: Within one year after screen

Number of stage I or IIA cancers diagnosed within 1 year of a positive screen divided by total number of screens

Screening Harms: False-positive (FP) recall rate (Aim 1)

时间窗: Within one year after screen

Number of positive screens without a cancer diagnosed within 1 year divided by total number of screens

Screening Harms: FP biopsy recommendation rate (Aim 1)

时间窗: Within one year after screen

Number of screens with a biopsy recommendation and no cancer diagnosed within 1 year divided by total number of screens

Rates of additional breast cancers detected (Aim 2)

时间窗: 6 months after initial diagnosis

Number of women with contralateral breast cancer diagnosed within 6 months of initial diagnosis over total number of women

3-year rate of 2nd breast cancer events (Aim 2)

时间窗: 3 years after initial diagnosis

Rate of 2nd breast cancers diagnosed within 3 years of follow-up (starting 6 months after initial diagnosis) calculated separately for ipsilateral and contralateral cancers

Patient Reported Outcomes (Aim 2)

时间窗: Measured 6-18 months post-diagnosis

Patient surveys targeted to determining outcomes of interest to patients

次要结局

  • Negative predictive value of work-up without MRI (Aim 2)(6 months after initial diagnosis)
  • Performance Measures: Positive predictive value (Aim 1)(Within one year after screen)
  • Performance Measures: Specificity (Aim 1)(Within one year after screen)
  • Definitive surgery type (Aim 2)(6 months after initial diagnosis)
  • Surgical biopsy rate (Aim 2)(6 months after initial diagnosis)
  • Benign biopsy rate (Aim 2)(6 months after initial diagnosis)
  • Performance Measures: Sensitivity (Aim 1)(Within one year after screen)
  • Core biopsy rates (Aim 2)(6 months after initial diagnosis)
  • Negative predictive value of work-up with MRI (Aim 2)(6 months after initial diagnosis)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (7)

Loading locations...

相似试验