跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03090009
NCT03090009Unknown早期 1 期

The Use of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs as a Tool of Positive Change in Peri-Implants Mucositis Microbiome

Polak David1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2017年4月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
早期 1 期
发起方
Polak David
入组人数
100
试验地点
1
主要终点
Change in the Microbiome

研究概览

简要总结

Dental implants are often used to replace missing teeth. In fact, in the US over 700,000 implants are places every year and over 2 million implants are places world wide. Peri-implant mucositis in an inflammatory condition affecting dental implants and is recognized as a risk factor for peri-implantitis (a condition affecting the bone around implants and eventually leading to implant loss). The prevalence of Peri-implant Mucositis has been reported in the literature to range from 50-90% whereas the prevalence of Peri-implantitis has been reported as high as 20%. it is commonly believed that a dysbiotic microbiome is the primary cause for these conditions.

The inflammatory burden around diseased implants creates a high-protein environment which is necessary for the survival of pathogenic bacteria. It is logical, therefore, that reducing inflammation by Non Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) may create a shift in the dysbiotic microbiome to a symbiotic microbiome. The aim of the current study is to test the effects of oral NSAIDs on the peri-implant microbiome.

详细描述

Inflammation around dental implants has been defined as Peri-implant mucositis and Peri-implantitis . Peri-implant mucositis is a localized inflammation limited to the mucosal tissue surrounding the implant whereas peri-implantitis has advanced to the bone surrounding the implant as well. The prevalence of Peri-implant Mucositis has been reported in the literature to range from 50-90% whereas the prevalence of Peri-implantitis has been reported as high as 20%. Due to the fact that there are many similarities in the clinical manifestations of infection in the gingiva and peri-implant mucosal tissue, studies attempted to compare the microbial characteristics around teeth to that found around implants. Emerging data suggests that the microbiome around infected teeth has some similarities and dissimilarities to peri-implant infection. Such differences may stem from different inflammatory characteristics as well as the presence of a non-vital foreign material (the dental implant) in the area. Some of the known pathogenic strains identified in the peri-implant sulcus are anaerobic a-saccharolytic bacteria, which feed off the adjacent tissue inflammatory exudate. Logically, attenuation of the inflammation would deprive the nearby bacteria of nourishment needed to sustain their growth.

The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) to control chronic inflammatory disease has been used extensively in medicine. Its action of blocking cyclooxygenase inflammatory pathway and in-effect blocking the production of Prostaglandin-E2 (PGE2) has led to its use with general pain control as well as its long term use in the treatment of tissue inflammation and pain caused by rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis, tendinitis and bursitis.

Offenbacher et al. as early as in 1981 discovered that patients with periodontitis had significantly higher levels of PGE2 in the sulcular fluid between gingiva and the tooth (GCF) . In a follow up study over a period of 18-36 months, Offenbacher observed that patients who had exhibited periodontal attachment loss had significantly higher levels of PGE2. This led Williams et al. to study the effects of Flurbiprofen, a phenylalkanoic derivative family of of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, on naturally occurring periodontal disease in an animal model over a period of 12 months. The study demonstrated decreases in alveolar bone loss in flurprofen treated animals at 3, 6 , 9 and 12 months. William et al then followed with a clinical trial where 44 patients who self administered peroral flurbiprofen twice daily for a period of 24 months. The study reported severely depressed bone loss rates over the period of the trial and as early as 6 months after administration of flurbiprofen that continued over the length of the trial. Other studied the drugs effect on other more aggressive forms of the disease with similar results . These results have been duplicated around implants as well. Jeffcoat et al demonstrated that oral intake flurbiprofen helped reduce bone loss around implants in the first year of service. Reddy similarly demonstrated with use of digital subtraction radiography, flurbiprofen taken orally was able to help increase bone density and apposition around implants after just 4 months.

The positive effect of systemic antibiotics and as well topical anti microbials on the pathogenic bacteria in the gingiva sulcus and peri-implant crevice has been well documented and is indisputable. The removal of these bacteria has helped promote tissue health. Similar results have been documented around implants as well. However more recently the reverse approach to disease control has gained popularity. Instead of trying just to reduce the bacterial challenge through antimicrobial/antibiotic therapy, modulating the host response to decrease the inflammatory destruction of the tissue, could be a more efficient and effective way of controlling the disease In decreasing the inflammatory environment, the pathogenic bacteria feeding off the inflammatory exudate would be greatly decreased, effecting a major change in the microbiome. To date nobody has characterized this change.

The purpose of the study is to test the effects of oral NSAIDS on the peri-implant microbiome. Also, clinical parameters will be tested for correlation with the microbial findings.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
Double (Participant, Investigator)

盲法说明

Both patient and investigator will blinded to the identity of the medication given.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • clinical diagnosis of Peri-implant Mucositis

排除标准

  • hypersensitivity to or intolerance of Flurbiprofen or NSAIDs
  • peptic ulcer
  • pregnancy
  • diabetes mellitus
  • having taken any antibiotic drug within the previous 6 weeks

研究组 & 干预措施

Flurbiprofen

Active Comparator

Flurbiprofen 100 mg bid.

干预措施: Flurbiprofen (Drug)

Placebo

Placebo Comparator

Placebo taken bid

干预措施: Placebo Oral Tablet (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Change in the Microbiome

时间窗: 28 days

The microbiome profile of the Flurbiprofen group before treatment (base line) and after treatment (day 14) and two weeks post-treatment (day 28) will be compared, as well as the microbiome of the placebo group. data will be pooled and analysed as absolute number of any microbe within the tested biofilms. Measures of change will be set as 14d vs. baseline and 28 day vs. baseline.

次要结局

  • change in periodontal probing depth(28 days)
  • change in bleeding on probing(28 days)
  • change in Suppuration(28 days)

研究者

发起方
Polak David
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Polak David

Principal Investigator

Hadassah Medical Organization

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验