MedPath

ESGE-Quality Improvement in Endoscopy: ERCP

Conditions
Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis
Registration Number
NCT06727851
Lead Sponsor
Universität Münster
Brief Summary

The primary aim of the present study is to compare the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) before and after the implementation of the QIC-guideline in 2017: "Performance measures for ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative".

Detailed Description

In 2017, a new guideline addressing the quality in ERCP entitled "Performance measures for ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative" was published. The focus of the quality improvement committee (QIC) of the ESGE is to ensure high standard of all endoscopy examinations throughout Europe by adhering to quality-improving factors (key performance indicators and minor performance indicators as defined by the ESGE).

The study shall provide the investigators with information whether the introduction of the quality performance measures adopted by the European Society of Endoscopy (ESGE) will actually lead to an improvement in quality.

The study will compare the quality development in endoscopy based on following time intervals:

1. before introduction of the QIC-initiative (before 2017)

2. after the introduction of the initiative (2017-2023) (both retrospective data),

3. prospectively, from 2024 onwards.

The primary endpoint of this study will be the key performance indicator post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). In the ESGE-guideline, a minimum standard of \<10% and a target standard of \<5% was recommended. Different studies described the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis between 3,47% and 10,2%.

The investigators hope that this study will lead to even greater patient safety in the future by improving findings and examination quality and therefore reduce the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis. In addition, the aim is to harmonize the high endoscopic standards throughout Europe.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1254
Inclusion Criteria

nclusion criteria Individuals eligible for inclusion are patients referred for ERCP who do not fulfill one of the following exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

  • Individuals eligible for inclusion are patients referred for ERCP who do not fulfill one of the following exclusion criteria
  • Age under 18 years
  • Inability to understand information for participation
  • Refusal of participation, missing cooperativity, e.g., due to age or disease
  • Pregnant or lactating patients
  • Patients with > 1 ERCP during the hospital stay: only the initial ERCP will be evaluated
Exclusion Criteria

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP)2016 - 2025

Comparison of the incidence of PEP before and after the implementation of the guideline. i. Clinical illness with typical pain (physical examination: pain in the upper belly with/without radiation to the back, tenderness when touching the belly) ii. laboratory testing with 3x increase of lipase (or amylase) iii. Characteristic findings in CE-CT, MRI or transabdominal sonography iv. Requiring extension of hospital stay

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Adequate antibiotic prophylaxis before ERCP2016 - 2025

Rate of adequate antibiotic prophylaxis before ERCP

Bile duct cannulation2016 - 2025

Rate of successful bile duct cannulation

Appropriate stent placement in patients with biliary obstruction below the hilum2016 - 2025

Rate of appropriate stent placement in patients with biliary obstruction below the hilum

Bile duct stone extraction2016 - 2025

Rate of successful bile duct stone extraction

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Muenster, Josephs Hospital Warendorf, Academic Teaching Hospital

🇩🇪

Warendorf, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath