跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06624306
NCT06624306进行中(未招募)不适用

Comparing Efficacy and Complication Between Prone Versus Prone-Flexed Position for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

Fayoum University Hospital2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 85 人开始时间: 2023年12月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
进行中(未招募)
入组人数
85
试验地点
2
主要终点
Comparing the prone with the prone-flexed position for PCNL reporting complications

研究概览

简要总结

Comparing Efficacy and Complication Between Prone Versus Prone-Flexed Position For Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Staghorn calculi
  • Renal pelvis stones >2 cm
  • Lower pole stones >1.5 cm
  • SWL-resistant stones

排除标准

  • Age <18 years or Pregnancy
  • Bilateral simultaneous PCNL
  • Need for 3 percutaneous tracts intraoperative
  • Morbid obesity (BMI >40)
  • Non opaque renal stones.
  • Refuse to complete study requirements
  • Atypical bowel interposition need CT guided puncture
  • Tumour in the presumptive access tract area or Potential malignant kidney tumour

结局指标

主要结局

Comparing the prone with the prone-flexed position for PCNL reporting complications

时间窗: 1 year

Outcome measures by using the clavien dindo classification system

次要结局

  • Assessment of stone free rate of the two groups(1 year)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Hesham Abdel Azim El Helaly

Assistant Professor

Fayoum University Hospital

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Comparing Efficacy and Complication Between Prone... | 临床试验