Comparing Efficacy and Complication Between Prone Versus Prone-Flexed Position for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

Not Applicable

Active, not recruiting

• Conditions: Urolithiasis; Kidney Stone; Complication

• Registration Number: NCT06624306
• Lead Sponsor: Fayoum University Hospital

Brief Summary

Comparing Efficacy and Complication Between Prone Versus Prone-Flexed Position For Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Status Verified: 2023-12
• Study Start: 2023-12-01
• Study First Submitted: 2024-09-24
• Study First Submitted QC: 2024-10-01
• Last Update Submitted: 2024-10-01
• Study First Posted: 2024-10-02
• Last Update Posted: 2024-10-02
• Primary Completion: 2024-12-01
• Study Completion: 2024-12-01

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 85

Inclusion Criteria

1. Staghorn calculi
2. Renal pelvis stones >2 cm
3. Lower pole stones >1.5 cm
4. SWL-resistant stones

Exclusion Criteria

1. Age <18 years or Pregnancy
2. Bilateral simultaneous PCNL
3. Need for 3 percutaneous tracts intraoperative
4. Morbid obesity (BMI >40)
5. Non opaque renal stones.
6. Refuse to complete study requirements
7. Atypical bowel interposition need CT guided puncture
8. Tumour in the presumptive access tract area or Potential malignant kidney tumour

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Comparing the prone with the prone-flexed position for PCNL reporting complications	1 year	Outcome measures by using the clavien dindo classification system

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Assessment of stone free rate of the two groups	1 year	Outcome measures by stone fragment residual ≤ 2 mm by computed tomography (CT)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Fayoum faculty of Medicine; 🇪🇬 Fayoum, Egypt