Comparing Efficacy and Complication Between Prone Versus Prone-Flexed Position for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)
Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
- Conditions
- UrolithiasisKidney StoneComplication
- Interventions
- Procedure: Prone-flexed PNLProcedure: Prone PNL
- Registration Number
- NCT06624306
- Lead Sponsor
- Fayoum University Hospital
- Brief Summary
Comparing Efficacy and Complication Between Prone Versus Prone-Flexed Position For Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 85
Inclusion Criteria
- Staghorn calculi
- Renal pelvis stones >2 cm
- Lower pole stones >1.5 cm
- SWL-resistant stones
Exclusion Criteria
- Age <18 years or Pregnancy
- Bilateral simultaneous PCNL
- Need for 3 percutaneous tracts intraoperative
- Morbid obesity (BMI >40)
- Non opaque renal stones.
- Refuse to complete study requirements
- Atypical bowel interposition need CT guided puncture
- Tumour in the presumptive access tract area or Potential malignant kidney tumour
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description prone-flexed PNL Prone-flexed PNL prone-flexed PNL prone PNL Prone PNL Prone PNL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparing the prone with the prone-flexed position for PCNL reporting complications 1 year Outcome measures by using the clavien dindo classification system
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Assessment of stone free rate of the two groups 1 year Outcome measures by stone fragment residual ≤ 2 mm by computed tomography (CT)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Fayoum faculty of Medicine
🇪🇬Fayoum, Egypt