MedPath

Comparing Efficacy and Complication Between Prone Versus Prone-Flexed Position for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Urolithiasis
Kidney Stone
Complication
Interventions
Procedure: Prone-flexed PNL
Procedure: Prone PNL
Registration Number
NCT06624306
Lead Sponsor
Fayoum University Hospital
Brief Summary

Comparing Efficacy and Complication Between Prone Versus Prone-Flexed Position For Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
85
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Staghorn calculi
  2. Renal pelvis stones >2 cm
  3. Lower pole stones >1.5 cm
  4. SWL-resistant stones
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Age <18 years or Pregnancy
  2. Bilateral simultaneous PCNL
  3. Need for 3 percutaneous tracts intraoperative
  4. Morbid obesity (BMI >40)
  5. Non opaque renal stones.
  6. Refuse to complete study requirements
  7. Atypical bowel interposition need CT guided puncture
  8. Tumour in the presumptive access tract area or Potential malignant kidney tumour

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
prone-flexed PNLProne-flexed PNLprone-flexed PNL
prone PNLProne PNLProne PNL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Comparing the prone with the prone-flexed position for PCNL reporting complications1 year

Outcome measures by using the clavien dindo classification system

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Assessment of stone free rate of the two groups1 year

Outcome measures by stone fragment residual ≤ 2 mm by computed tomography (CT)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Fayoum faculty of Medicine

🇪🇬

Fayoum, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath