Intensified, Inpatient Adaptation of Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT)
- Conditions
- Borderline Personality Disorder
- Registration Number
- NCT01904227
- Lead Sponsor
- Rivierduinen, Centre for Personality disorders Jelgersma
- Brief Summary
An randomized clinical trial to investigate whether among adult borderline patients (18 - 40 year), intensified inpatient short term (12 weeks) inpatient Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) is more effective in declining the proportion of patients that show suicidal/self-harming behavior in the first 3 months of treatment, compared to standard outpatient DBT, and whether this difference between the groups is sustained at 6 and 12 months.
- Detailed Description
Objective: Goal is to evaluate the (cost-)effectiveness of a short term intensive DBT treatment program (12 weeks) versus outpatient DBT, in terms of reduction of suicidal and/or self-harming behavior, and of general BPD symptomatology severity.
Study design: A randomized trial, analyzed by a intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, with two parallel groups: a) intensified adapted DBT program (12 weeks inpatient program, plus six months standard outpatient DBT, n=36); b) standard outpatient DBT for 12 months (n=36).
Study population: All borderline patients (18-40 years), who will be admitted from January 2013 till June 2014 for treatment in the Jelgersma Treatment Centre, or the outpatient DBT programs of Rivierduinen, who: (1) receive a diagnosis of BPD, (2) have shown suicidal and/or self-harming behavior in the year preceding the admission/ start of DBT treatment, including the last month preceding baseline measurement, and (3) show a severe level of borderline symptomatology (\> 24 on the BPDSI).
Intervention:
All patients receive DBT according to the basic DBT treatment protocol. Treatment integrity is established by supervision in both groups.
Outcome measures Main study parameter is the number of suicide attempts/self-harming acts (the Life Time Parasuicide Count and the Parasuicide Scale of the Borderline Personality Severity Index). Second study parameter is the severity of borderline symptomatology (BPDSI). Quality of life as measured on the SF-36, and the EQ-5D and psychopathological symptoms (BSI) will also be taken into account. The cost-effectiveness of the inpatient program compared to the outpatient program will be examined (TiC-P).
Sample size. The researchers expect that after 12 weeks of treatment, 20% of the patients of the intervention group still show suicidal and/or self-harming behavior compared to 60% of the patients in the control condition, and that this difference sustains after 24 weeks and will be gradually reduced between 24 and 52 weeks by the additional reduction in suicidal and/or self-harming behavior in the control group. To be able to detect a difference of 40% after 12 weeks, with a power of 0.80 and α = 0.05, 36 patients per experimental condition are required. The researchers expect to recruit about 150 patients, which guarantees enough power, even with a 20% drop out rate.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 150
- Patients admitted in the period of January 2013 until January 2014
- patients who fulfill the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV Text Revision criteria for BPD,
- patients who have shown suicidal and/or self-harming behavior in the year preceding the admission/ start of DBT treatment, including the last month preceding baseline measurement,
- patients who show a severe level of borderline symptomatology ( > 24 on the BPDSI),
- patients who are in sufficient command of the Dutch language
:
- Intelligence Quotient < 80,
- a chronic psychotic condition,
- bipolar disorder,
- hard drug abuse that requires inpatient detoxification,
- forced treatment framework,
- DBT in the year preceding intake.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method assessing change in number of suicide attempts/self-harming acts baseline, 0, 12, 24 and 52 weeks after the start of the inpatient treatment The Lifetime Parasuicide Count (LPC: Comtois \& Linehan, 1999), obtains information about the frequency and subsequent medical treatment of self-mutilating behaviors (e.g. cutting, burning and pricking). Duration of the interview depends on how frequent and how much self-destructive behavior has been shown. Patients report that they feel that their problems are taken seriously because of the interview.
The Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index (BPDSI: (Giessen-Bloo et al., 2010) is a semi-structured interview assessing the frequency of borderline symptoms in the previous 3-month period. The BPDSI consists of nine sections, one for each of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV criteria for borderline personality disorder. The parasuicide section includes three items reflecting distinct suicidal behaviors (suicide threats, preparations for suicide attempts, and actual suicide attempts).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method assessing change in the severity of borderline symptomatology at baseline, 0, 12, 24 and 52 weeks after the start of the inpatient treatment The Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index (BPDSI: (Giessen-Bloo et al., 2010) is a semi-structured interview assessing the frequency of borderline symptoms in the previous 3-month period. The BPDSI consists of nine sections, one for each of the criteria for borderline personality disorder from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV.The parasuicide and impulsivity sections have shown reasonable internal consistencies (0.69 and 0.67, respectively), excellent interrater reliability (0.95 and 0.97, respectively) and good concurrent validity ( Arntz et al., 2003). Three month test-retest reliability for the total BPDSI score was 0.77. Patients have reported that they feel acknowledged by the BPDSI for their problems (van den Bosch, 2005).
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
LMC van den Bosch
🇳🇱Oegstgeest, Netherlands
LMC van den Bosch🇳🇱Oegstgeest, Netherlands