MedPath

A study to compare two techniques of microsurgery for fixing hole in the eardrum which are not healing on their ow

Not Applicable
Conditions
Health Condition 1: H720- Central perforation of tympanic membrane
Registration Number
CTRI/2024/07/070573
Lead Sponsor
Dr Sudip Kumar Nath
Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ot Yet Recruiting
Sex
Not specified
Target Recruitment
0
Inclusion Criteria

Cases of chronic otitis media with inactive mucosal disease with a small to large central perforation and pure conductive hearing loss were included in the study. Active mucosal disease under local and systemic antibiotic coverage for 7 days. Both males and females in the age group of 10 to 60 years of age were included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

1.Patients with squamosal disease

2.Patients with ossicular discontinuity/ necrosis

3.Patients below 10 years and above 60 years were excluded from the study.

4.Patients with active focus of infection in throat, nose and oral cavity

5.Patients who fail to follow-up for at least 3 months.

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To analyse and compare the outcomes of interlay and underlay techniques in type 1 tympanoplasty in terms of graft uptake and hearing improvement.Timepoint: 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after surgery
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Expected findings and complications after type 1 tympanoplastyTimepoint: 1 yrs;To find out the etiological factors of mucosal type of COMTimepoint: 1 yr;To find the incidence of CSOM in 10- 60yrs age groupTimepoint: 1 yr
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath