A clinical trial to Compare clinical and imaging evaluation in surgicalextraction of third molar teeth using two different surgical techniques
Phase 3
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: M270- Developmental disorders of jaws
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/10/046244
- Lead Sponsor
- DIV OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY AFMC PUNE
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Clinical and radiological diagnosis of all Horizontally impacted mandibular third molar (Winterââ?¬•s Sub-Classification).
Both male and female patients aged between 18 and 35 years of age
Exclusion Criteria
All Mesioangular,Vertical and Distoangular impacted mandibular third molars (Winterââ?¬•s classification)
Forceps extractions not requiring osteotomy
Any pathological condition that may affect bone healing
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the clinical outcome based on Pain assesed on Visual Analog Scale (VAS),Maximum inter-incisal mouth opening in millimetres and duration of the procedure recorded in minutes in patients undergoing surgical extraction of mandibular third molars using Piezosurgery unit and conventional rotary instrumentsTimepoint: After 7 days
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. To compare the bone density using Cone Beam Computed Tomography in HOUSEFIELD UNITS formed in the extraction socket after surgical extraction of horizontally impacted mandibular 3rd molars using Piezoelectric unit and conventional rotary technique <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>2.To compare the complication rate in surgical extraction of horizontally impacted mandibular 3rd molars using Piezoelectric unit and conventional rotary techniqueTimepoint: After 12 months