The Effect of SBAR Communication Program on Nursing Students' Perceptions of Clinical Decision Making and Medical Error Prevention Levels: A Mixed Methods Study

Not Applicable

Not yet recruiting

• Conditions: Mixed Method Implementation Study; Nursing; Nursing Students; Nursing Education Research

• Registration Number: NCT06978634
• Lead Sponsor: Aytap DİNCER

Brief Summary

In clinical settings, teamwork plays a vital role in improving patient care outcomes. Effective and structured communication within the team ensures that a holistic service is provided to patients. However, unclear and inadequate communication between healthcare professionals is a common problem. Such communication problems can be one of the main factors that compromise patient safety and lead to medication errors. Nurses play a key role in this process as they are the healthcare professionals who interact most with patients. Nurses need to not only correctly understand the instructions to be given to the patient, but also to convey information about the patient clearly and accurately to other nurses, doctors and other members of the healthcare team. In this context, opportunities to communicate using a common language and develop these skills form an essential part of the education of nursing students. The use of structured communication tools, especially SBAR, can play an important role in the prevention of medical errors while improving the clinical decision-making skills of future nurses. The SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) communication tool is a structured model used to ensure effective communication in healthcare. "The Effect of SBAR Communication Program on Clinical Decision Making and Medical Error Awareness Levels of Nursing Students: A Mixed Method Study" is a mixed method research using experimental and qualitative research designs. The data of the research will be collected with the "Student Information Form", "Clinical Decision Making Scale in Nursing" and "Medical Error Scale for Nursing Students" "Semi-Structured Interview Form". Quantitative data processing and statistical analysis will be done with SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) software. Qualitative data analysis will be done using hand coding and content analysis method. As a result, this research will clearly demonstrate the benefits of integrating communication tools such as SBAR into nursing education, contribute to the development of new methods in education and the reduction of medical errors.

Detailed Description

The main purpose of handover communication is stated to provide accurate and up-to-date information about patient care, treatment, service use, current status and expected changes in this situation. Ineffective handovers, such as not providing all necessary information, can pose a danger to patients and staff, lead to irrelevant, repetitive and hypothetical information being communicated in the shift report and can cause misuse of resources. The aim of this study, designed as a mixed method, is to develop and implement a role-playing program with scenarios for nursing students using the SBAR communication technique. In addition, it is to examine students' clinical decision-making and medical error awareness as a result of the program. In this direction, when the literature is examined, it is concluded that the role-playing program conducted by Yu and Kang in 2017 using the SBAR technique with nursing students can be used to improve communication skills in nurse-doctor handover and to develop communicative competence in nursing students. In another study examining the experiences and perspectives of nurses who use the SBAR technique to improve patient care, it has been revealed that there are significant improvements in active patient controls and documentation control. It has also been shown that the use of standard protocols and communication tools for bedside handover improves patient care continuity.

A review of the literature on teaching SBAR to nursing students reveals that a variety of teaching methods are used. Methods such as standard patient video recording and feedback, role playing, and computer training have been used to teach communication skills. Several studies have used a combination of didactic and interactive teaching methods (such as role playing) to teach SBAR and have demonstrated positive effects on nurses' communication knowledge, attitudes, and abilities.

Clinical decision making, data analysis, and the application of these skills in a clinical context are important components of the nursing profession. Rapid decision making by nurses shortens treatment time, promotes care, and reduces treatment costs. On the other hand, failure to make timely and appropriate decisions leads to delays in treatment and waste of resources. Therefore, it affects the quality of care. Moreover, in the organizational context, nurses are members of a clinical team. Teamwork requires continuous decision-making. These decisions can affect teamwork and determine the quality of care. When the literature is examined, a study examining the effect of the SBAR communication program on the clinical decision-making levels of nursing students has shown that SBAR-based education can improve nursing students' communication skills and clinical decision-making skills. Similarly, Oh et al. (2021) showed that SBAR-based simulation learning can improve nursing students' clinical judgments and increase confidence in interprofessional communication. Medical errors often occur after breakdowns in handover communications. An analysis of assessment notes conducted by the Joint Commission shows that more than two-thirds of on-call incidents are caused by communication breakdowns, and at least 50% of them occur during handover. To avoid communication breakdown, the SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation) technique provides a standardized communication framework for conveying information to healthcare professionals, especially in critical situations that require immediate intervention. Both the Institute for Healthcare Improvement and the Joint Commission recommend the SBAR tool as one of the ways to improve patient and staff safety with its standardized and easy-to-use format for organizing and sharing clinical data among clinicians.

Study Timeline

• Status Verified: 2025-05
• Study First Submitted: 2025-05-09
• Study Start: 2025-05-15
• Study First Submitted QC: 2025-05-16
• Last Update Submitted: 2025-05-16
• Study First Posted: 2025-05-18
• Last Update Posted: 2025-05-18
• Primary Completion: 2025-11-15
• Study Completion: 2025-12-15

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 80

Inclusion Criteria

• Being a student registered in the nursing department,
• Having clinical practice experience (being a 3rd year student),
• Not being a student in an exchange program such as Erasmus,

Exclusion Criteria

• Coming with a vertical transfer exam
• No clinical practice experience

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Clinical Decision Making in Nursing	5 week	It was developed by Jenkins (1983) to measure the perceptions of clinical decision-making of nursing students and nurses. Validity and reliability studies in Türkiye were conducted by Durmaz-Edir and Sarıkaya (2015). The scale; Exploring options and ideas (10 items) (1, 3, 6, 7, 16, 22, 27, 30, 32, 37), exploring goals and values (10 items) (2, 9, 10, 14, 21, 31, 33, 35, 38, 40), evaluating consequences (10 items) (13, 17, 18, 23, 25, 26, 28, 29, 34, 39) and searching for information and adopting new information objectively (10 items) (4, 5, 8, 11, 12, 15, 19, 20, 24), 36 items) consists of four subscales and 40 items. The options on a five-point Likert scale are; (1) Never (2) Rarely (3) Sometimes (4) Often (5) Always. The scale's 22 items (1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 16, 17, 18, 20, 26, 27, 28, 29, 33, 35, 36, 37, 38) have positive and 18 items (2, 4, 6, 12, 13, 15, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 30, 31, 32, 34, 39, 40) have negative values. The 18 scale items with negative meanings ar

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Ataturk University; 🇹🇷 Erzurum, Yakutiye, Turkey