High frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation in Pediatric Acute Respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled study

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Respiratory; Paediatrics; Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

• Registration Number: PACTR201609001779105
• Lead Sponsor: Paediatric Department, Alexandria University

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Study Start: 2016-09-12
• Last Update Posted: 29 May 2023

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Complete
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 200

Inclusion Criteria

If patients had a ratio of the partial pressure of arterial oxygen (Pao2) to the fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio2) of 200 mm Hg or less and bilateral pulmonary infiltrates were visible on chest radiography without evidence of left atrial hypertension, according to American¿European Consensus Conference Committee (AECC) definition of ARDS.

Exclusion Criteria

- pulmonary edema of cardiac origin or due to volume overload
- patients with congenital heart disease,
- diagnosis of cardiomyopathy or myocarditis,
- post cardiac surgery for congenital heart defects.

Study & Design

• Study Type: Interventional
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Oxygenation improvement

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
30 day mortality;PICU length of stay(survivors);Mechanical ventilation days (survivors);Mechanical ventilation free days (survivors)till 30 days;Air leaks occurrence