Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/EUCTR2008-004998-17-IE
EUCTR2008-004998-17-IE
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable

Comparison of continuous paravertebral blockade (PVB) and continuous thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) for analgesia following open renal surgery

Department of Anaesethesia0 sitesAugust 19, 2008
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
DrugsChirocaineSublimaze

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Not specified
Sponsor
Department of Anaesethesia
Status
Active, not recruiting
Last Updated
14 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
August 19, 2008
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
14 years ago
Study Type
Interventional clinical trial of medicinal product
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Department of Anaesethesia

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Adults 18\-80 years
  • •Presenting for elective open renal surgery
  • •Written informed consent
  • •Are the trial subjects under 18? no
  • •Number of subjects for this age range:
  • •F.1\.2 Adults (18\-64 years) yes
  • •F.1\.2\.1 Number of subjects for this age range
  • •F.1\.3 Elderly (\>\=65 years) yes
  • •F.1\.3\.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Patient refusal
  • •Contraindication to neuraxial blockade
  • •Local infection at site of insertion
  • •Allergy to levobupivacaine, fentanyl, paracetamol or morphine.
  • •Severe kyphoscoliosis
  • •Previous thoracic vertebral surgery
  • •Systemic anticoagulation or coagulopathy
  • •Uncontrolled hypertension
  • •Uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus
  • •Severe liver or cardiac dysfunction

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
A comparison of pain relief options after a mastectomy. A paravertebral block in an injection paralell to the spine and blocks the nerves suppling the surgical area. A wound catheter is place in the surgical wound and used to numb the area.This study will involve the administration of levobupivicaine 0.125% and 0.25%, a local anaesthetic agent licensed for this purpose into the paravertebral space and into the surgical wound, to provide postoperative analgesia for adults having a mastecomy. We aim to compare the analgesia efficacy of paravertebral blockade with surgical wound blockade for post operative pain in the first 48 hours.MedDRA version: 14.0Level: LLTClassification code 10054711Term: Postoperative painSystem Organ Class: 10022117 - Injury, poisoning and procedural complicationsTherapeutic area: Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment [E] - Anesthesia and Analgesia [E03]
EUCTR2011-002867-40-IEDepartment of Anaesthesia
Completed
Not Applicable
Efficacy of continuous paravertebral blocks in breast surgery
JPRN-UMIN000011610Gifu University Hospital Department of Anesthesiology&Pain Medicine60
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of Efficacy of Paravertebral Block and Transforaminal Block in Acute Herpes zosterCertain infectious and parasitic diseases
KCT0002090The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital210
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of two methods of paravertebral block for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: intrathoracic approach and ultrasound-guided approachNeoplasms
KCT0006471The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital74
Completed
Not Applicable
Continuous L2 Paravertebral Block Versus Continuous Lumbar Plexus Block for Postoperative AnalgesiaTotal Hip Arthroplasty
NCT01571492University of Pittsburgh60