Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of the Flex Robotic System for the Surgical Removal of Colorectal Lesions
- Conditions
- Colorectal Neoplasm
- Interventions
- Procedure: ColonoscopyProcedure: Endoscopic UltrasoundOther: Medical Chart ReviewOther: Medical Device Usage and EvaluationProcedure: Resection
- Registration Number
- NCT05674123
- Lead Sponsor
- Mayo Clinic
- Brief Summary
This clinical trial assesses the safety and effectiveness of a new device called the Flex Robotic System in the surgical removal (resection) of colorectal lesions. When an area of abnormal tissue called a lesion is found in the colon or rectum, it is often not known if the lesion is cancerous or non-cancerous. Recommendation to remove the lesion may be made. Current methods of resection can be challenging and time-consuming. The Flex Robotic System is a new device that provides a stable working environment, better ability to grasp and cut lesions, and better tissue handling when performing a resection. The Flex Robotic system may be more effective at removing colorectal lesions than standard resection techniques.
- Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To assess the rates of complete en bloc resection and adverse events of the Flex Robotic System for distal colorectal lesions.
OUTLINE:
Patients undergo resection with Flex Robotic System on study. Patients also undergo colonoscopy with or without rectal endoscopic ultrasound at screening.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 2
- Age >= 22 years (minimum age approved for use)
- Polypoid (0-Is) and non-polypoid (0-IIa, 0-IIb and 0-IIc) lateral spreading lesions according to Paris classification
- Colorectal lesions situated between 5 and 15 cm from the dentate line
- Colorectal mucosal lesions ranging from 1.5 to 7 cm in maximum diameter
- Colorectal subepithelial lesions < 2 cm in size
- Absence of uncorrectable bleeding disorder or coagulopathy
- Platelet count > 50,000
- International normalized ratio (INR) < 1.5
- Ability to give informed consent
- Inability to receive general anesthesia
- Presence of medical conditions for which a transanal approach is contraindicated (e.g., anal stricture, radiation proctopathy)
- Excavated (0-III) colorectal lesions according to Paris classification
- Suboptimal colon preparation
- Clinical discretion of the provider
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Device Feasibility (Flex Robotic System) Colonoscopy Patients undergo resection with Flex Robotic System on study. Patients also undergo colonoscopy with or without rectal endoscopic ultrasound at screening. Device Feasibility (Flex Robotic System) Medical Chart Review Patients undergo resection with Flex Robotic System on study. Patients also undergo colonoscopy with or without rectal endoscopic ultrasound at screening. Device Feasibility (Flex Robotic System) Medical Device Usage and Evaluation Patients undergo resection with Flex Robotic System on study. Patients also undergo colonoscopy with or without rectal endoscopic ultrasound at screening. Device Feasibility (Flex Robotic System) Endoscopic Ultrasound Patients undergo resection with Flex Robotic System on study. Patients also undergo colonoscopy with or without rectal endoscopic ultrasound at screening. Device Feasibility (Flex Robotic System) Resection Patients undergo resection with Flex Robotic System on study. Patients also undergo colonoscopy with or without rectal endoscopic ultrasound at screening.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Rates of complete en bloc resection Up to 2 years Rates of complete en bloc resection
Incidence of adverse events Up to 2 years The primary endpoint will be the Incidence of adverse events using the Flex Robotic System for distal colorectal lesions.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
🇺🇸Rochester, Minnesota, United States