Fluconazol Versus Medical Honey in the Treatment of Recurrent Vulvovaginal Candidiasis
- Conditions
- Candidiasis, VulvovaginalRecurrent Candidiasis of Vagina
- Interventions
- Other: L-Mesitran
- Registration Number
- NCT04626258
- Lead Sponsor
- Maastricht University Medical Center
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of Flucanzol versus L-mesitran in the treatment of patients with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. The investigator will look at vaginal swabs after 1, 6 and 12 months. The investigator included 252 patients.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 252
-
• Women of at least 18 years old
- Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (At least 3 episodes of clinical symptoms during the last year)
- Clinical and microbiological diagnosis of (recurrent) vulvovaginal candidiasis at time of consultation
- Capacity to understand, consent, and comply with the trial procedures
-
Mixed vaginal infections
- Pregnancy or the intention to become pregnant during the study period
- Women using systemic or topical antifungal medication during the last 2 weeks prior to inclusion
- Known allergies for Fluconazole or honey
- Candida with resistance for Fluconazole
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description L-Mesitran L-Mesitran The first month every day apply L-mesitran, the next five months apply L-mesitran every week on the vagina Active comparator: Fluconazol Fluconazole Once a month one capsule Fluconazol 150 mg
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Vaginal swab 12 months The main study parameter is the mycological cure rate after one month of therapy for both the treatment (L-Mesitran®) and control (Diflucan®) groups.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Side effect of medication will be termined with questionnaires 12 months The secondary objectives are to investigate the effects of both treatments on the clinicalcure rate and symptoms, including redness, irritation, itching, dysuria, dyspareunia, vaginal discharge after 1, 6, 9, and 12 months of therapy. In addition, the prophylactic activity after 6 months maintenance therapy, and the long-term efficacy as number of relapses within 12 months will be investigated. Moreover, information about side effects, discomfort, quality of life, therapy compliance, and cost of treatments for both products will be collected and compared.
Quality of life will be termined with questionnaires 12 months The secondary objectives are to investigate the effects of both treatments on the clinical cure rate and symptoms, including redness, irritation, itching, dysuria, dyspareunia, vaginal discharge after 1, 6, 9, and 12 months of therapy. In addition, the prophylactic activity after 6 months maintenance therapy, and the long-term efficacy as number of relapses within 12 months will be investigated. Moreover, information about side effects, discomfort, quality of life, therapy compliance, and cost of treatments for both products will be collected and compared.