In Vivo Confocal Microscopic Analysis of Corneal Nerve Changes After ProKera Slim® for Dry Eye
- Conditions
- Dry Eye Disease
- Interventions
- Other: Cryopreserved amniotic membrane
- Registration Number
- NCT02764814
- Lead Sponsor
- Tissue Tech Inc.
- Brief Summary
Prospective controlled pilot study to compare the outcome of ProKera® (PK) and conventional treatment in patients with moderate to severe Dry Eye Disease (DED)
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
- Subjects with moderate to severe DED (Grade 2-4 DEWS)
- Age range: 21 years and older.
- Both genders and all ethnic groups comparable with the local community.
- Subjects able to understand and willing to sign a written informed consent.
- Subjects able and willing to cooperate with investigational plan.
- Subjects able and willing to complete postoperative follow-up.
- Symblepharon or lid abnormality preventing ProKera placement.
- Ocular infection within 14 days prior to study entry.
- Active ocular allergies.
- Previous ocular surgery or injury within 3 months before enrollment.
- Previous brain surgery, or Trigeminal nerve damage.
- Other conditions that may affect corneal nerves such as diabetes, thyroid disorders.
- Contact lens wearers.
- Pregnancy or subject expecting to be pregnant.
- Inability or unwillingness of subject to give written informed consent.
- Subjects with known intolerance to PK.
- Subjects use concomitant therapy that affects tear functions or ocular surface integrity.
- Subjects currently engaged in another clinical trial.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Treatment Cryopreserved amniotic membrane subjects receiving cryopreserved amniotic membrane
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Short-term efficacy in terms of corneal nerve regeneration Change from Baseline to 1 month Assessed by corneal topography
Short-term efficacy in terms of ocular surface integrity Change from Baseline to 1 month Assessed by in vivo confocal microscopy
Short-term efficacy in terms of corneal sensitivity Change from Baseline to 1 month Short-term efficacy in terms of ocular clinical symptoms Change from Baseline to 1 month Assessed by SPEED questionnaire, pain score, and dry eye workshop grading
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Long-term efficacy in terms of corneal nerve regeneration Change from Baseline to 3 month Assessed by corneal topography
Long-term efficacy in terms of ocular surface integrity Change from Baseline to 3 month Assessed by in vivo confocal microscopy
Long-term efficacy in terms of corneal sensitivity Change from Baseline to 3 month Long-term efficacy in terms of ocular clinical symptoms Change from Baseline to 3 month Assessed by SPEED questionnaire, pain score, and dry eye workshop grading
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Thomas John Vision Institute, P.C.
🇺🇸Tinley Park, Illinois, United States