MedPath

In Vivo Confocal Microscopic Analysis of Corneal Nerve Changes After ProKera Slim® for Dry Eye

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Dry Eye Disease
Interventions
Other: Cryopreserved amniotic membrane
Registration Number
NCT02764814
Lead Sponsor
Tissue Tech Inc.
Brief Summary

Prospective controlled pilot study to compare the outcome of ProKera® (PK) and conventional treatment in patients with moderate to severe Dry Eye Disease (DED)

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  • Subjects with moderate to severe DED (Grade 2-4 DEWS)
  • Age range: 21 years and older.
  • Both genders and all ethnic groups comparable with the local community.
  • Subjects able to understand and willing to sign a written informed consent.
  • Subjects able and willing to cooperate with investigational plan.
  • Subjects able and willing to complete postoperative follow-up.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Symblepharon or lid abnormality preventing ProKera placement.
  • Ocular infection within 14 days prior to study entry.
  • Active ocular allergies.
  • Previous ocular surgery or injury within 3 months before enrollment.
  • Previous brain surgery, or Trigeminal nerve damage.
  • Other conditions that may affect corneal nerves such as diabetes, thyroid disorders.
  • Contact lens wearers.
  • Pregnancy or subject expecting to be pregnant.
  • Inability or unwillingness of subject to give written informed consent.
  • Subjects with known intolerance to PK.
  • Subjects use concomitant therapy that affects tear functions or ocular surface integrity.
  • Subjects currently engaged in another clinical trial.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
TreatmentCryopreserved amniotic membranesubjects receiving cryopreserved amniotic membrane
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Short-term efficacy in terms of corneal nerve regenerationChange from Baseline to 1 month

Assessed by corneal topography

Short-term efficacy in terms of ocular surface integrityChange from Baseline to 1 month

Assessed by in vivo confocal microscopy

Short-term efficacy in terms of corneal sensitivityChange from Baseline to 1 month
Short-term efficacy in terms of ocular clinical symptomsChange from Baseline to 1 month

Assessed by SPEED questionnaire, pain score, and dry eye workshop grading

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Long-term efficacy in terms of corneal nerve regenerationChange from Baseline to 3 month

Assessed by corneal topography

Long-term efficacy in terms of ocular surface integrityChange from Baseline to 3 month

Assessed by in vivo confocal microscopy

Long-term efficacy in terms of corneal sensitivityChange from Baseline to 3 month
Long-term efficacy in terms of ocular clinical symptomsChange from Baseline to 3 month

Assessed by SPEED questionnaire, pain score, and dry eye workshop grading

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Thomas John Vision Institute, P.C.

🇺🇸

Tinley Park, Illinois, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath