Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04668040
NCT04668040CompletedNot Applicable

Comparing the Effects of Stretching and Muscle Energy Technique in the Management of Lower Cross Syndrome

Riphah International University1 site in 1 country58 target enrollmentStarted: July 1, 2018Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
58
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
ROM assessment of iliopsoas

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to compare the effects of stretching exercises & muscle energy techniques in the management of lower cross syndrome and to find the effective treatment in the lower cross syndrome management.

Detailed Description

In 2015 the systematic review estimated that prevalence of Chronic low back pain in 24 to 39 year old individual was 4.2% and the individual between 20 to 59 was 19.6% . The genesis and perpetuation of Low back pain (LBP) has many underlying factors among which one is proposed by Janda's concept of pelvic crossed syndrome. This condition describes a pattern of tight and weak muscles around the pelvis. Marked postural deviation is seen such as increased lumber lordosis and depending on this lordosis the muscle involvement can be distinguished. The center of the gravity is slightly anterior to S1 or S2, which means pelvis position, is key to faulty or good alignment.

Various studies have been done on muscle imbalance Lower crossed syndrome (LCS) using Stretching and Muscle energy Technique (MET). Both have shown superior effects when compared to other treatment modalities/techniques. However there is paucity of literature on effectiveness of stretching and MET in management of LCS.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
20 Years to 50 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • LCS pattern in standing position
  • Patients having Chronic low back pain
  • Age : 20-50 years
  • Both male and females
  • Positive Prone Hip Extension movement pattern test

Exclusion Criteria

  • Fracture (wedge compression #)
  • Inflammatory disorder
  • Acute disc bulge
  • Lumber instability
  • Idiopathic scoliosis
  • Patient with Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other systemic diseases

Arms & Interventions

Stretching

Active Comparator

Stretching technique applied in the lower cross syndrome muscle pattern.

Intervention: Stretching (Other)

Muscle energy technique

Experimental

Muscle energy technique applied in the lower cross syndrome muscle pattern.

Intervention: Muscle energy technique (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

ROM assessment of iliopsoas

Time Frame: 4th week

Range of motion (ROM) was taken via goniometer for iliopsoas was measured with double inclinometer.

Numeric pain rating scale

Time Frame: 4th week

It was calculated through Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) in which 0 was the lowest value with no pain label and 10 was the highest value with worst possible pain label. The Subjects with respect to their pain intensity were asked to mark a level of NPRS.

ROM assessment of hamstrings

Time Frame: 4th week

Range of motion (ROM) was taken via goniometer for hamstrings was measured with double inclinometer.

ROM assessment of rectus femoris

Time Frame: 4th week

Range of motion (ROM) was taken via goniometer for rectus femoris was measured with double inclinometer.

ROM assessment of erector spinae

Time Frame: 4th week

Range of motion (ROM) was taken via goniometer for erector spinae was measured with double inclinometer.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials