跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04790396
NCT04790396进行中(未招募)不适用

Carotid Ultrasound Under Pulsed-wave Doppler Mode to Check the Pulse in Cardiopulmonary Arrest Patients.

National Taiwan University Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2020年12月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
进行中(未招募)
入组人数
50
试验地点
1
主要终点
Carotid ultrasound under pulsed-wave doppler compared with manual palpation

研究概览

简要总结

It's crucial to determine whether a pulse is present or not in patient with cardiac arrest. But more and more studies have shown that manual palpation is unreliable for detecting pulse 1-4. Failure to detect pulselessness may cause delay of chest compression and directly affect the patient's outcome. Likewise, failure to rapidly detect return of spontaneous circulation may cause prolonged chest compression and increase associated injury during resuscitation.

More and more studies have demonstrated that echo guided pulse detection is feasible 5-7. The aim of our study is to check carotid pulse via ultrasound. This is a prospective study and the patient selection is in-hospital or out of hospital cardiac arrest. A curvilinear ultrasonography transducer is used and placed transversely on either right/left carotid artery under pulsed-wave doppler mode to check whether the pulse is present or not. The result of ultrasonography will be compared with manual palpation and to determine the accuracy and effectiveness of clinical usage.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Only
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
20 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • any patient presenting at ER with cardiac arrest older than 20 years-old

排除标准

  • younger than 20 years-old
  • patient who is pregnant

结局指标

主要结局

Carotid ultrasound under pulsed-wave doppler compared with manual palpation

时间窗: 5 seconds during pulse check period of resuscitation

The result of ultrasonography will be compared with manual palpation and to determine the effectiveness (e.g., the time need to confirm whether pulse is present or not under manual palpation and ultrasound) of clinical usage.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验