MedPath

Biceps Tenodesis with 360 Suture Anchor Versus Self Locking Tenodesis in the Absence of Rotator Cuff Tears

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
SLAP Lesion
Registration Number
NCT06772103
Lead Sponsor
Clinique Générale dAnnecy
Brief Summary

This is a prospective randomized controlled trial. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical results and complications of self-locking biceps tenodesis and double-loop 360 lasso biceps tenodesis for the treatment of pathology of the long head of the biceps or superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) during shoulder arthroscopy in patients without arthroscopic rotator cuff tears. Currently, there is no consensus on the use of tenodesis versus tenotomy to treat pathology of the long head of the biceps during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Numerous studies have examined the clinical results of long biceps tenotomy versus long biceps tenodesis, and there is no evidence to date of superiority of either technique. However, these studies were carried out on patients with rotator cuff tears, and so it has not been possible to directly compare the two procedures. At Clinique Générale, we use a new, innovative technique called autobloc tenodesis to treat pathologies of the long head of the biceps. There are no comparative studies between autobloc tenodesis of the biceps and biceps tenodesis in patients without rotator cuff tears. Given its potential advantages, autobloc biceps tenodesis could become the new technique of choice for treating biceps longus tendon pathology, potentially reducing differences in outcomes such as Popeye deformity. The information provided by this study could potentially guide future clinical practice, helping surgeons choose the most appropriate treatment for their patients with long biceps tendon pathology.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  • Tendinopathy of the Long Head of the Biceps based on clinical symptoms or SLAP-type lesion
  • Partial thickness rupture or absence of rupture of the rotator cuff of the subscapular, supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendons, diagnosed preoperatively on ultrasound, arthro-CT or MRI.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint, defined by narrowing of the glenohumeral joint space or osteophytes, using AP radiography of the affected shoulder.
  • Distance between acromion and humeral head measuring 6 mm or less
  • Previous shoulder surgery.
  • Dementia or inability to complete questionnaires and assessments.
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding patient
  • Protected adult patient
  • Patient not covered by social security.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Constant score1 year after surgery

100-point scale comprising four components, including a patient-reported section (pain 15 points and activity level 20 points), for a total of 35 points. Alongside this is a doctor-reported section (shoulder strength 25 points, range of motion 40 points) for a total of 65 points.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Clinique Générale

🇫🇷

Annecy, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath