Voice-related Outcomes in Response to Intensive Versus Traditional Therapy Programs
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Dysphonia
- Sponsor
- University of Wisconsin, Madison
- Enrollment
- 15
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Self-efficacy and readiness scale Changes
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if there are differences in treatment outcomes between traditional voice therapy, performed weekly for a maximum of 6 weeks versus intensive voice therapy, consisting of 4-6 therapy sessions performed within one day.
Detailed Description
The goal of voice therapy is optimal long-term vocal quality and communication function with minimal recurrence. Traditional voice therapy for dysphonia typically consists of one to two therapy sessions each week with a single clinician for about 8 weeks. Another approach of voice therapy is intensive short-term therapy also known as "boot camp." This approach, borrows from the disciplines of neurobiology, exercise physiology, motor learning, and psychotherapy which describe desirable learning and behavior changes influenced by practice that involves high-intensity overload, variability, and specificity of training. A few studies have showed that "Boot Camp" model of intensive therapy resulted in comparable gains in voice quality and vibratory mechanics and may promote better patient satisfaction and attendance. While such findings support the notion that intensive voice therapy may enhance voice therapy outcomes, no study to date has examined patient response to the "Boot Camp" approach to voice therapy. The investigators will compare the outcomes of traditional, weekly voice therapy and intensive voice therapy with multiple sessions in one day.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Diagnosed with a Voice disorder
- •Diagnosed with benign vocal fold lesions and/or hyper-function
- •First/primary propose treatment modality is voice therapy
- •Patients who are appropriate for either standard of care treatment modality (traditional or intensive voice therapy)
- •Willingness to participate in either standard of care treatment modality
- •All races
- •Males and females
- •English speaking
Exclusion Criteria
- •Younger than 18
- •Inability or unwillingness to participate in one of the standard of care treatment modalities
- •Laryngeal Surgery or procedures during course of study
- •Prisoners
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Self-efficacy and readiness scale Changes
Time Frame: Baseline compared to Immediately post voice therapy
Pre to Post difference in participant's self-efficacy for voice practice and healthy voice technique between therapy groups and within subsets of subjects - readiness ruler of 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely)
Self-efficacy and readiness scale Change
Time Frame: Baseline compared to 12 weeks post voice therapy
Pre to Post difference in participant's self-efficacy for voice practice and healthy voice technique between therapy groups and within subsets of subjects - readiness ruler of 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely)