Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00590356
NCT00590356
Withdrawn
Phase 4

A Randomized Comparison of Percutaneous CLip-based Vascular Occluder (Star-Close) Versus Bio-absorble Hemostatic Device (Angio-SEal) for Femoral Artery Hemostasis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Seung-Jung Park1 site in 1 countryMarch 2007

Overview

Phase
Phase 4
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Percutaneous Intervention Via Femoral Artery
Sponsor
Seung-Jung Park
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Composite of major vascular complications necessitating surgical or percutaneous repair.
Status
Withdrawn
Last Updated
9 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Starclose (Abbott Vascular Devices) for femoral access site closure in patients undergoing PCI compared to Angio-Seal STS Plus (St. Jude Medical).

Detailed Description

The growing success of interventions and requirement for day case or outpatient procedures has led to a concomitant rise in the use of arteriotomy closure devices (ACD) to achieve hemostasis and allow early mobilization following arterial punctures. ACD have emerged as an alternative to traditional mechanical compression after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). When compared to manual compression, several studies have confirmed patient comfort, reduced time to achieve hemostasis, reduced time to ambulation, and early discharge. Recently, CLIP Trial was conducted to evaluated the safety and efficacy of the StarClose device in subjects undergoing diagnostic and interventional catheterization procedures. A total of 17 U.S. sites enrolled 596 subjects, with 483 subjects randomized at a 2:1 ratio to receive StarClose or standard compression of the arteriotomy after the percutaneous procedure. The study included roll-in (n=113), diagnostic (n=208), and interventional (n=275) arms with a primary safety endpoint of major vascular complications through 30 days and a primary efficacy endpoint of postprocedure time to hemostasis. This trial demonstrated that the StarClose Vascular Closure System is noninferior to manual compression with respect to the primary safety endpoint of major vascular events in subjects who undergo percutaneous interventional procedures. StarClose significantly reduced time to hemostasis, ambulation, and dischargeability when compared with compression. However, there are no studies randomly comparing these two closure devices. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Starclose (Abbott Vascular Devices) for femoral access site closure in patients undergoing PCI compared to Angio-Seal STS Plus (St. Jude Medical).

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
March 2007
End Date
June 2008
Last Updated
9 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Seung-Jung Park
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Seung-Jung Park

professor, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine

CardioVascular Research Foundation, Korea

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • The patient must be at least 18 years of age.
  • Patients with appropriate arterial puncture in the common femoral artery eligible for percutaneous closure device deployment Patients undergoing PCI (only 7F sheath)
  • Patient or guardian agrees to the study protocol and the schedule of clinical follow-up, and provides informed, written consent, as approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Severe peripheral vascular disease
  • Severe femoral artery tortousity and calcification
  • Severe obesity (BMI \> 35)
  • History of bleeding diathesis or known coagulopathy (including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia), or will refuse blood transfusions
  • Current known current platelet count \<100,000 cells/mm3 or Hgb \<10 g/dL.
  • Patients with cardiogenic shock
  • Acute MI patients within symptom onset \< 12 hours needing primary angioplasty

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Composite of major vascular complications necessitating surgical or percutaneous repair.

Time Frame: 30-days after randomization

Secondary Outcomes

  • Procedure time.(30-days after treatment)
  • Procedure success.(30-days after treatment)
  • The time to hemostasis.(30-days after treatment)
  • Device success.(30-days after treatment)
  • Time to ambulation.(30-days after treatment)
  • Time to discharge.(30-days after treatment)
  • Subject's comfort level during the deployment of the StarClose using the 11-point Box Scale (BS-11).(30-days after treatment)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials