Prospective Randomized Trial On Radiation Dose Estimates Of CT Angiography In Patients Applying Iterative Image Reconstruction Techniques - The PROTECTION V Study -
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Interventions
- Radiation: Intervention groupRadiation: Control group
- Registration Number
- NCT01453712
- Lead Sponsor
- Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
- Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to compare a standard coronary CT angiography scan protocol with conventional image reconstruction with a scan protocol using reduced tube current and a new image reconstruction algorithm. The investigators hypothesize that the image quality of the new scan protocol is not inferior, while radiation dose estimates are reduced by around 30%.
Secondary endpoints of the study include quantitative image quality parameters, prevalence of non-diagnostic studies, prevalence of coronary artery plaques and plaque characteristics (calcified, non-calcified, mixed) and prevalence of follow-up examinations.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 400
- patients with an indication for a coronary CT angiography (planned evaluation of the coronary arteries)
- signed informed consent
- stable sinus rhythm
- age > 18 years
- known allergy to contrast agents.
- patients with known coronary artery disease
- pregnancy
- no stable sinus rhythm
- coronary ct examinations not focussing on coronary arteries
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Intervention group Intervention group Using the new scan protocol with 30 % less tube current and iterative image reconstruction algorithm. Control group Control group Conventional coronary CT angiography using standard reconstruction technique (filtered back projection).
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Image quality 1 month Compared with a conventional scan protocol the use of a new scan protocol using iterative image reconstruction and reduced tube current is associated with a comparable diagnostic image quality, while the radiation dose estimates are significantly reduced.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Quantitative image quality parameters 1 month Quantitative image quality parameters, e.g. image noise, signal and contrast intensity, signal- and contrast-to-noise-ratios
Prevalence of coronary artery plaques 1 month Prevalence of coronary artery plaques and coronary artery plaques characteristics (non-calcified, calcified, mixed) in both study arms.
Prevalence of non-diagnostic examinations 1 month Prevalence of non-diagnostic examinations in both study arms.
Radiation dose 1 month Radiation dose in both study arms.
Prevalence of follow-up examinations 1 month Prevalence of follow-up examinations in both study arms.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
🇩🇪Muenchen, Bavaria, Germany