Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession Defects Using a New Xenogenic Collagen Membrane Compared to Connective Tissue Graft: a Randomized Controlled Split-mouth Clinical Study
Not Applicable
Recruiting
- Conditions
- Gingival Recession
- Interventions
- Procedure: Treatment of gingival recessions
- Registration Number
- NCT04800250
- Lead Sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
- Brief Summary
Limitation of donor site and significant postoperative morbidity are often described in connective tissue graft. We want to show if mucogain matrix used in tunnel technique to recover RTI Cairo recessions defects could be an alternative to connective tissue graft
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
Inclusion Criteria
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description A - Mucogain matrix on right Treatment of gingival recessions The patient will receive mucogain matrix on right side and connective tissue graft on left side. B - Mucogain matrix on left Treatment of gingival recessions The patient will receive mucogain matrix on left side and connective tissue graft on right side.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Mean root coverage obtained with both techniques 6 months To compare the mean root coverage obtained with the Creos® Mucogain matrix and connective tissue graft in the treatment of Cairo RT1 class maxillary recessions (Miller Class 1).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Postoperative complications with both techniques 10 days To compare the occurrence of postoperative complications (haemorrhage, edema) within the first 10 days.
Postoperative pain with both techniques 6 months To compare postoperative pain with both techniques
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
CHU de Nice
🇫🇷Nice, Provence Alpes Cote d'Azur, France