Abdominal Rectus Diastasis (ARD) Reconstruction
- Conditions
- Rectus Diastasis
- Interventions
- Procedure: ARD
- Registration Number
- NCT04182412
- Lead Sponsor
- Karolinska Institutet
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to investigate whether abdominal wall reconstruction through laparoscopic surgery can be recommended as a safe treatment alternative for patients with symptomatic rectus diastasis, and if this type of treatment leads to improved quality of life, trunk stability and reduced pain.
- Detailed Description
Investigate whether surgical reconstruction with laparoscopic technique can lead to improved quality of Life, trunk stability and reduced pain in patients with symptomatic rectus diastasis. The study will also compare two different laparoscopic surgery methods for abdominal wall reconstruction: narrowing of linea alba with continuous suture with or without mesh.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 110
- Rectus diastasis ≥3 cm
- BMI =<28 kg/m2
- non smoker
- abdominal instability,
- abdominal wall and/or lower back pain despite physical therapy / structured physical exercise for at least 6 months
- BMI >28 kg/m2
- Smoking
- Ongoing immunosuppressive therapy
- Current pregnancy ≥16 weeks gestational age for the last 12 months
- Pregnant or women who wish to become pregnant
- Previously extensive abdominal wall surgery incl hernia surgery (NOT including sectio, appendectomy, small umbilical herniae)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Suture ARD laparoscopic narrowing of linea alba with continuous suture suture and mesh ARD narrowing of linea alba with continuous suture and mesh
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Rate of recurrence 1 year computed tomography
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method SF-36 Quality of Life instrument 1 year, 3 years The RAND-36 It is comprised of 36 items that assess eight health concepts: physical functioning, role limitations caused by physical health problems, role limitations caused by emotional problems, social functioning, emotional well-being, energy/fatigue, pain, and general health perceptions. Physical and mental health summary scores are also derived from the eight RAND-36 scales. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) 1 year, 3 years Scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst possible pain
Abdominal stability 1 year, 3 years patient self-esteem by one question; do you feel that the instability of the abdominal wall has disappeared, yes/no/partially
VHPQ is a questionnaire for the assessment of pre- and postoperative pain 1 year, 3 years The questionnaire comprises 20 questions The first six questions concern the level and duration of pain. The next seven questionsrelate to the impact on daily activities. The final questions deal with patient satisfaction and how physically demanding the patients regard their occupation. Pain intensity in the VHPQ is assessed using a 7-step fixed-point rating scale with steps linked to pain behavior rather than numbers or verbal descriptors of pain. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Karolinska Institutet, Ersta Hospital
🇸🇪Stockholm, Region Stockholm, Sweden