Ebastine Versus Mebeverine in IBS Patients
- Conditions
- IBS - Irritable Bowel SyndromeIBS
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT05815602
- Lead Sponsor
- Guy Boeckxstaens
- Brief Summary
Multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial comparing ebastine and mebeverine as treatment of irritable bowel syndrome
Trial rationale
1. To perform a randomized superiority trial comparing the clinical efficacy of ebastine and mebeverine
2. To evaluate the impact of treatment with ebastine compared to mebeverine on quality of life and quality-adjusted life years
Primary objective To provide further evidence of the superiority of histamine 1 receptor antagonism as novel treatment for patients with non-constipated IBS, as compared to mebeverine, one of the spasmolytics currently used as first line treatment of IBS.
Secondary objective(s) To provide evidence that the histamine 1 receptor antagonist ebastine is more effective in reducing abdominal pain compared to the commonly used antispasmodic mebeverine
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 200
- Voluntary written informed consent of the participant or their legally authorized representative has been obtained prior to any screening procedures
- Patients fulfilling the Rome IV criteria for non-constipated IBS (IBS-C subtypes will be excluded)
- No organic cause that can explain the presenting symptoms (exclusion of coeliac disease (blood), lactose intolerance (breath test), inflammatory bowel disease and giardiasis (stool)
- Patients with lactose intolerance can be included if no improvement on lactose free diet during 6 weeks
- Age 18-65
- History of coeliac disease, food allergy, giardiasis, inflammatory bowel disease, infectious gastroenteritis, motility disorder, serious liver kidney cardiac or pulmonary disease, known cardiac rhythm disorders, insuline-dependent diabetes, psychiatric diseases
- Pregnancy, breast feeding
- Medication: the use of antidepressants or antipsychotics, anti-allergic medication or drugs affecting gastrointestinal motility / visceral sensitivity (anti-cholinergics, antispasmodics, 5-HT3 antagonists, 5-HT4 agonists, loperamide, codeine, laxatives, analgesics: only paracetamol is allowed as analgetic, other analgesics are forbidden.), CYP3A4-inducing and inhibiting drugs. Potent inhibitors of CYP3A4 include clarithromycin, erythromycin, diltiazem, itraconazole, ketoconazole, ritonavir, verapamil, goldenseal and grapefruit. Inducers of CYP3A4 include phenobarbital, phenytoin, rifampicin, St. John's Wort and glucocorticoids.
- Symptoms started following abdominal surgery
- IBS constipation dominant (IBS-C)
- Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients listed in section 6.1 of the SmPC of the respective medicinal products
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Ebastine verum and duspatalin placebo Ebastine - Duspatalin verum and ebastine placebo Duspatalin -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Clinical Response to Global Relief of Symptoms 12 weeks of study medication administration Global Relief of Symptoms is assessed on a weekly basis using a 7-point scale for 12 weeks during treatment and run-out: a Weekly Responder is defined if he has total or obvious relief of symptoms.
Clinical Response to Abdominal Pain Intensity 12 weeks of study medication administration The primary endpoint is defined as Clinical Response to Abdominal Pain Intensity and Global Relief of Symptoms. A clinical responder is defined to be a Weekly Responder for both Abdominal Pain Intensity and Global Relief of Symptoms for at least 3 out of the 6 last weeks of treatment.
Abdominal Pain Intensity is assessed daily by the subject during the 14 days prior to (run-in) and following (run-out) randomization and for 12 weeks during treatment, using a 10-point scale. For each week during and following treatment, an average pain score is calculated. Then %change from the mean baseline will be calculated. An Abdominal Pain Intensity Weekly Responder is defined as a subject who had a decrease of \>=30% compared with baseline.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (5)
UZLeuven
π§πͺLeuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
GZA
π§πͺAntwerpen, Belgium
AZ St-Maarten
π§πͺMechelen, Antwerpen, Belgium
UZA
π§πͺAntwerpen, Belgium
AZ St-Lucas
π§πͺBrugge, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium