MedPath

Ebastine Versus Mebeverine in IBS Patients

Phase 3
Recruiting
Conditions
IBS - Irritable Bowel Syndrome
IBS
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT05815602
Lead Sponsor
Guy Boeckxstaens
Brief Summary

Multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial comparing ebastine and mebeverine as treatment of irritable bowel syndrome

Trial rationale

1. To perform a randomized superiority trial comparing the clinical efficacy of ebastine and mebeverine

2. To evaluate the impact of treatment with ebastine compared to mebeverine on quality of life and quality-adjusted life years

Primary objective To provide further evidence of the superiority of histamine 1 receptor antagonism as novel treatment for patients with non-constipated IBS, as compared to mebeverine, one of the spasmolytics currently used as first line treatment of IBS.

Secondary objective(s) To provide evidence that the histamine 1 receptor antagonist ebastine is more effective in reducing abdominal pain compared to the commonly used antispasmodic mebeverine

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
200
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Voluntary written informed consent of the participant or their legally authorized representative has been obtained prior to any screening procedures
  2. Patients fulfilling the Rome IV criteria for non-constipated IBS (IBS-C subtypes will be excluded)
  3. No organic cause that can explain the presenting symptoms (exclusion of coeliac disease (blood), lactose intolerance (breath test), inflammatory bowel disease and giardiasis (stool)
  4. Patients with lactose intolerance can be included if no improvement on lactose free diet during 6 weeks
  5. Age 18-65
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  1. History of coeliac disease, food allergy, giardiasis, inflammatory bowel disease, infectious gastroenteritis, motility disorder, serious liver kidney cardiac or pulmonary disease, known cardiac rhythm disorders, insuline-dependent diabetes, psychiatric diseases
  2. Pregnancy, breast feeding
  3. Medication: the use of antidepressants or antipsychotics, anti-allergic medication or drugs affecting gastrointestinal motility / visceral sensitivity (anti-cholinergics, antispasmodics, 5-HT3 antagonists, 5-HT4 agonists, loperamide, codeine, laxatives, analgesics: only paracetamol is allowed as analgetic, other analgesics are forbidden.), CYP3A4-inducing and inhibiting drugs. Potent inhibitors of CYP3A4 include clarithromycin, erythromycin, diltiazem, itraconazole, ketoconazole, ritonavir, verapamil, goldenseal and grapefruit. Inducers of CYP3A4 include phenobarbital, phenytoin, rifampicin, St. John's Wort and glucocorticoids.
  4. Symptoms started following abdominal surgery
  5. IBS constipation dominant (IBS-C)
  6. Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients listed in section 6.1 of the SmPC of the respective medicinal products
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Ebastine verum and duspatalin placeboEbastine-
Duspatalin verum and ebastine placeboDuspatalin-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Clinical Response to Global Relief of Symptoms12 weeks of study medication administration

Global Relief of Symptoms is assessed on a weekly basis using a 7-point scale for 12 weeks during treatment and run-out: a Weekly Responder is defined if he has total or obvious relief of symptoms.

Clinical Response to Abdominal Pain Intensity12 weeks of study medication administration

The primary endpoint is defined as Clinical Response to Abdominal Pain Intensity and Global Relief of Symptoms. A clinical responder is defined to be a Weekly Responder for both Abdominal Pain Intensity and Global Relief of Symptoms for at least 3 out of the 6 last weeks of treatment.

Abdominal Pain Intensity is assessed daily by the subject during the 14 days prior to (run-in) and following (run-out) randomization and for 12 weeks during treatment, using a 10-point scale. For each week during and following treatment, an average pain score is calculated. Then %change from the mean baseline will be calculated. An Abdominal Pain Intensity Weekly Responder is defined as a subject who had a decrease of \>=30% compared with baseline.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (5)

UZLeuven

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ

Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium

GZA

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ

Antwerpen, Belgium

AZ St-Maarten

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ

Mechelen, Antwerpen, Belgium

UZA

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ

Antwerpen, Belgium

AZ St-Lucas

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ

Brugge, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Β© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath