Belatacept With Early Steroid Withdrawal rATG and Everolimus in Renal Transplantation (BETTER Trial)
- Conditions
- Kidney Transplant Rejection
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT04849533
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Cincinnati
- Brief Summary
This study is designed to determine the safety and efficacy of two calcineurin inhibitor free treatment groups 1) a belatacept, everolimus and early corticosteroid withdrawal (ECSWD) immunosuppressive regimen with rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction (rATG) and 2) a belatacept, mycophenolate, chronic steroid regimen with rATG and compare to historical controls of tacrolimus-based and belatacept-based regimens in combination with rATG induction, mycophenolate, and ESWD in renal transplant recipients.
The purpose is to evaluate the effect of 2 regimens (rATG induction/belatacept/everolimus/ESWD and rATG induction/belatacept/mycophenolate/CS) on the composite of patient death, graft loss, or eGFR (MDRD) \< 45 mL/min/1.73m2 at Month 12 post-transplantation compared to historical controls of the BEST Trial (groups B and C).
- Detailed Description
The BETTER trial is designed to determine the safety and efficacy of two calcineurin inhibitor free treatment groups 1) a belatacept, everolimus and early corticosteroid withdrawal (ESWD) immunosuppressive regimen with rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction (rATG) and 2) a belatacept, mycophenolate, chronic steroid regimen with rATG and compare to historical controls of tacrolimus-based and belatacept-based regimens in combination with rATG induction, mycophenolate, and ESWD in renal transplant recipients.
Study Hypotheses
1. A belatacept-based immunosuppressive regimen with rATG induction, everolimus and ESWD in renal transplant recipients will lead to less risk of graft loss, patient death, or eGFR \<45ml/min/1.73m2 at 12 and 24 months as compared to a tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen with rATG, mycophenolate, and ESWD in renal transplant recipients (historical control from the BEST Trial-Group C).
2. A belatacept-based immunosuppressive regimen with rATG induction, everolimus and ESWD in renal transplant recipients will lead to less risk of graft loss, patient death, or eGFR \<45ml/min/1.73m2 at 12 and 24 months as compared to a belatacept-based immunosuppressive regimen with rATG and mycophenolate, and ESWD in renal transplant recipients (historical control from the BEST Trial-Group B).
3. A belatacept-based immunosuppressive regimen with rATG, mycophenolate and CS in renal transplant recipients will lead to less risk of graft loss, patient death, or eGFR \<45ml/min/1.73m2 at 12 and 24 months as compared to a tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen with rATG, mycophenolate, and ESWD in renal transplant recipients (historical control from the BEST Trial-Group C).
4. A belatacept-based immunosuppressive regimen with rATG induction, mycophenolate and CS in renal transplant recipients will lead to less risk of graft loss, patient death, or eGFR \<45ml/min/1.73m2 at 12 and 24 months as compared to a belatacept-based immunosuppressive regimen with rATG, mycophenolate, and ESWD in renal transplant recipients (historical control from the BEST Trial-Group B).
A controlled, randomized group study is accepted in renal transplantation to evaluate new immunosuppressive regimens versus the current standard of care. Although the ideal study would employ a blinded methodology with a simultaneous control group to minimize bias, the study will not be blinded and evaluates a historical control groups conducted in similar centers.
To allow comparison between studies, the primary composite endpoint of death, graft loss, or eGFR \<45ml/min/1.73m2 will be analyzed similarly. The secondary and tertiary endpoints are the similar as well.
The BETTER study proposes to compare two additional treatment groups of rATG/belatacept/everolimus/ESWD (Group D) and rATG/belatacept/mycophenolate/CS (Group E) to the historical control Groups B and C.
All immunosuppressive agents are approved by the FDA for the prophylaxis of renal transplant rejection, and will be dosed and administered consistent with current clinical practice.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 120
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Group E Bela/MMF corticosteroids rATG induction/belatacept/mycophenolate/chronic steroidsrATG 1.5mg/kg IV X 4 doses over 10 days belatacept 10mg/kg IV X 1 on POD 1, POD 5, weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 then 5mg/kg IV X 1 on week 16 and then every 4 weeks thereafter Steroid taper x 5 days (500mg IV, 250mg IV, 125mg IV, 80mg po, 60mg po) and then 5mg po daily thereafter MMF 1gm BID started pre-op and then continued throughout study Group D Bela/EVR Everolimus rATG induction/belatacept/everolimus/early steroid withdrawal rATG 1.5mg/kg IV X 4 doses over 10 days belatacept 10mg/kg IV X 1 on POD 1, POD 5, weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 then 5mg/kg IV X 1 on week 16 and then every 4 weeks thereafter Steroid taper x 5 days (500mg IV, 250mg IV, 125mg IV, 80mg po, 60mg po) Everolimus started within 24hours at 2mg BID and dosed to level 3-8ng/ml Group D Bela/EVR rabbit antithymocyte globulin rATG induction/belatacept/everolimus/early steroid withdrawal rATG 1.5mg/kg IV X 4 doses over 10 days belatacept 10mg/kg IV X 1 on POD 1, POD 5, weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 then 5mg/kg IV X 1 on week 16 and then every 4 weeks thereafter Steroid taper x 5 days (500mg IV, 250mg IV, 125mg IV, 80mg po, 60mg po) Everolimus started within 24hours at 2mg BID and dosed to level 3-8ng/ml Group E Bela/MMF mycophenolate mofetil rATG induction/belatacept/mycophenolate/chronic steroidsrATG 1.5mg/kg IV X 4 doses over 10 days belatacept 10mg/kg IV X 1 on POD 1, POD 5, weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 then 5mg/kg IV X 1 on week 16 and then every 4 weeks thereafter Steroid taper x 5 days (500mg IV, 250mg IV, 125mg IV, 80mg po, 60mg po) and then 5mg po daily thereafter MMF 1gm BID started pre-op and then continued throughout study Group E Bela/MMF Belatacept rATG induction/belatacept/mycophenolate/chronic steroidsrATG 1.5mg/kg IV X 4 doses over 10 days belatacept 10mg/kg IV X 1 on POD 1, POD 5, weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 then 5mg/kg IV X 1 on week 16 and then every 4 weeks thereafter Steroid taper x 5 days (500mg IV, 250mg IV, 125mg IV, 80mg po, 60mg po) and then 5mg po daily thereafter MMF 1gm BID started pre-op and then continued throughout study Group E Bela/MMF rabbit antithymocyte globulin rATG induction/belatacept/mycophenolate/chronic steroidsrATG 1.5mg/kg IV X 4 doses over 10 days belatacept 10mg/kg IV X 1 on POD 1, POD 5, weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 then 5mg/kg IV X 1 on week 16 and then every 4 weeks thereafter Steroid taper x 5 days (500mg IV, 250mg IV, 125mg IV, 80mg po, 60mg po) and then 5mg po daily thereafter MMF 1gm BID started pre-op and then continued throughout study Group D Bela/EVR Belatacept rATG induction/belatacept/everolimus/early steroid withdrawal rATG 1.5mg/kg IV X 4 doses over 10 days belatacept 10mg/kg IV X 1 on POD 1, POD 5, weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 then 5mg/kg IV X 1 on week 16 and then every 4 weeks thereafter Steroid taper x 5 days (500mg IV, 250mg IV, 125mg IV, 80mg po, 60mg po) Everolimus started within 24hours at 2mg BID and dosed to level 3-8ng/ml
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Composite endpoint of patient death, graft loss, or eGFR (MDRD) < 45ml/min mL/min/1.73m2 12 months Number of subjects with composite endpoint of either patient death, graft loss, or eGFR (MDRD) \< 45 mL/min/1.73m2 at Month 12 post-transplantation compared to historical controls of the BEST Trial (groups B and C).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method # Patients with development of de novo donor specific antibody (DSA) 12 and 24 months Patients with development of de novo donor specific antibody (DSA) after transplant
Incidence of graft survival censored by patients who died with functioning graft 12 and 24 months Incidence of death-censored graft survival not including any patients who died with their graft still functioning
# of Patients with eGFR (MDRD) < 30 mL/min/1.73m2 12 and 24 months # of subjects with eGFR (MDRD) \< 30 mL/min/1.73m2
# Patients with Incidence of Infections 12 and 24 months Incidence of infections, including CMV and BK virus
Incidence of Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) by Banff 2007 criteria stratified by type (ACR, AMR, or Mixed rejection) 12 and 24 months To evaluate, by treatment group at 12 and 24 months incidence of various rejection types
Composite endpoint of patient death, graft loss, or estimated eGFR (MDRD) < 45 mL/min/1.73m2 at Month 24 post-transplantation 24 months Composite endpoint of patients with either death, graft loss, or estimated eGFR (MDRD) \< 45 mL/min/1.73m2 at Month 24 post-transplantation
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
The Christ Hospital
🇺🇸Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
University of Cincinnati
🇺🇸Cincinnati, Ohio, United States