Total Versus Partial Arytenoidectomy in Bilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis
- Conditions
- Airway ObstructionVocal Cord Paralysis
- Interventions
- Procedure: Total arytenoidectomyProcedure: Partial arytenoidectomy
- Registration Number
- NCT01824849
- Lead Sponsor
- Hacettepe University
- Brief Summary
Total arytenoidectomy is claimed to increase risk of aspiration and cause more voice loss than other operations performed for bilateral vocal fold paralysis (BVFP). However, objective evidence for such conclusion is lacking. There is no study comparing swallowing and voice after total and partial arytenoidectomy.
- Detailed Description
Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, case-control Setting: Tertiary, referral, university Patients: Twenty patients with BVFP Intervention: Endoscopic total and partial arytenoidectomy
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
- Bilateral vocal fold paralysis
- Previously operated patients
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Total arytenoidectomy Total arytenoidectomy Endoscopic total arytenoidectomy was performed on patients. Partial arytenoidectomy Partial arytenoidectomy Endoscopic partial arytenoidectomy was performed on patients.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Decannulation From the day of operation until 52 weeks after arytenoidectomy Preoperative examinations were repeated 1 year after surgery.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Duration of operation At the day of operation The duration of operation was measured in minutes at the day of operation.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Hacettepe University Hospital
🇹🇷Ankara, Turkey