MedPath

Total Versus Partial Arytenoidectomy in Bilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Airway Obstruction
Vocal Cord Paralysis
Interventions
Procedure: Total arytenoidectomy
Procedure: Partial arytenoidectomy
Registration Number
NCT01824849
Lead Sponsor
Hacettepe University
Brief Summary

Total arytenoidectomy is claimed to increase risk of aspiration and cause more voice loss than other operations performed for bilateral vocal fold paralysis (BVFP). However, objective evidence for such conclusion is lacking. There is no study comparing swallowing and voice after total and partial arytenoidectomy.

Detailed Description

Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, case-control Setting: Tertiary, referral, university Patients: Twenty patients with BVFP Intervention: Endoscopic total and partial arytenoidectomy

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  • Bilateral vocal fold paralysis
Exclusion Criteria
  • Previously operated patients

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Total arytenoidectomyTotal arytenoidectomyEndoscopic total arytenoidectomy was performed on patients.
Partial arytenoidectomyPartial arytenoidectomyEndoscopic partial arytenoidectomy was performed on patients.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
DecannulationFrom the day of operation until 52 weeks after arytenoidectomy

Preoperative examinations were repeated 1 year after surgery.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Duration of operationAt the day of operation

The duration of operation was measured in minutes at the day of operation.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hacettepe University Hospital

🇹🇷

Ankara, Turkey

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath