Laryngeal Injuries After Removal of the Tracheal Tube: A Comparison Between Sevoflurane and Propofol
- Conditions
- Vocal Cord; Injury, Superficial
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT01616966
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Rostock
- Brief Summary
Vocal cord injuries occur not only during tracheal intubation, but also during surgery and during removal of tracheal tube. Volatile anesthetics increase neuromuscular block of muscle relaxants. Thus, the investigators tested the hypothesis, that sevoflurane would cause less vocal cord injuries than a total intravenous anesthesia with propofol.
- Detailed Description
Volatile anaesthetics increase neuromuscular block of neuromuscular blocking drugs. We tested the hypothesis, that sevoflurane would cause less vocal cord injuries than an intravenous anaesthesia with propofol. Sixty five patients were randomly assigned to the SEVO group (anaesthesia with sevoflurane) or TIVA group (anaesthesia with propofol). Vocal cord injuries were examined by stroboscopy before and 24 and 72 h after surgery; hoarseness was assessed up to 72 h.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 65
- orotracheal intubation
- surgery of the ear
- written consent
- ASA I-III
- preexisting pathologies of the vocal cords
- obesity
- difficult airway
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Sevoflurane Sevoflurane Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane during surgery. Anesthesia with propofol propofol Anesthesia was maintained with propofol during surgery.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method incidence of vocal cord injuries 24h after surgery assessed by stroboscopy
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method incidence of hoarseness 24h after surgery
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Rostock
🇩🇪Rostock, Mecklenburg/Vorpommern, Germany