MedPath

Laryngeal Injuries After Removal of the Tracheal Tube: A Comparison Between Sevoflurane and Propofol

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Vocal Cord; Injury, Superficial
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT01616966
Lead Sponsor
University of Rostock
Brief Summary

Vocal cord injuries occur not only during tracheal intubation, but also during surgery and during removal of tracheal tube. Volatile anesthetics increase neuromuscular block of muscle relaxants. Thus, the investigators tested the hypothesis, that sevoflurane would cause less vocal cord injuries than a total intravenous anesthesia with propofol.

Detailed Description

Volatile anaesthetics increase neuromuscular block of neuromuscular blocking drugs. We tested the hypothesis, that sevoflurane would cause less vocal cord injuries than an intravenous anaesthesia with propofol. Sixty five patients were randomly assigned to the SEVO group (anaesthesia with sevoflurane) or TIVA group (anaesthesia with propofol). Vocal cord injuries were examined by stroboscopy before and 24 and 72 h after surgery; hoarseness was assessed up to 72 h.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
65
Inclusion Criteria
  • orotracheal intubation
  • surgery of the ear
  • written consent
  • ASA I-III
Exclusion Criteria
  • preexisting pathologies of the vocal cords
  • obesity
  • difficult airway

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
SevofluraneSevofluraneAnesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane during surgery.
Anesthesia with propofolpropofolAnesthesia was maintained with propofol during surgery.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
incidence of vocal cord injuries24h after surgery

assessed by stroboscopy

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
incidence of hoarseness24h after surgery

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Rostock

🇩🇪

Rostock, Mecklenburg/Vorpommern, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath