Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06418386
NCT06418386CompletedNot Applicable

Clinical Assessment of Antimicrobial Effect of Rotary Versus Manual Filing System Using Different Irrigants in Primary Molars

Mansoura University1 site in 1 country30 target enrollmentStarted: September 12, 2022Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
30
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
number of of colony forming units

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study will evaluate and compare the microbial efficacy of rotary and manual filing system using Neem extract, NaOCL and saline . with hypotheses that neem can used alternative to sodium hypochlorite and there is no difference between rotary and manual filling in bacterial reduction.

Detailed Description

The calculated sample size of the study will be 22 participants for each group at 5% level of significance and 80 % power 30 participants for each group (10 for The sample size will be increased tocompensate for incomplete data and to increase the study each subgroup) topower

Grouping:

30 child will be selected from the Pediatric Clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University .the child should have 2 contralateral primary molars indicated for pulpectomy. The children will be randomly divided into 2 main groups according to type of file used in root canal preparation: Group I with manual file. Group II with rotary file.

Then the children will be randomly sub grouped according to irrigant that will be used:

Group IA and group II A with normal saline. Group IB and group II B with neem . Group IC and group II C with NaOCl . clinical procedures :

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
4 Years to 8 Years (Child)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •age group 4 -8 years.
  • •good health.
  • •No recent history of antibiotic coverage for at least two weeks
  • •necrotic teeth.
  • •restorable tooth structure.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •more than 2/3 resorption of root.
  • •uncooperative patient.
  • •detection perforation on radiograph.

Arms & Interventions

rotary saline

Experimental

AF baby files for pediatric( fanta ) and normal saline

Intervention: rotary saline IIA (Procedure)

manual saline

Active Comparator

manual k files for pulpectomy and normal saline irrigation

Intervention: manual saline IA (Procedure)

manual neem extract

Experimental

manual k files and 100% neem extract

Intervention: manual neem IB (Procedure)

manual sodium hypochlorite

Experimental

mannul k files and 1% sodium hypochlorite

Intervention: manual sodium hypochlorite IC (Procedure)

rotary neem

Experimental

AF baby files for pediatric( fanta ) and 100% NEEM EXTRACT

Intervention: rotary neem IIB (Procedure)

rotary sodium hypochloride

Experimental

AF baby files for pediatric( fanta ) and 1% sodium hypochloride

Intervention: rotary sodoium hypochlorite IIC (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

number of of colony forming units

Time Frame: 48 hours after culture

number of of colony forming units less the better instrumentation technique and irritant

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Menna Mahgoub

principle investigator

Mansoura University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials