跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2025/11/097921
CTRI/2025/11/097921尚未招募不适用

Comparison of target controlled infusion of dexmedetomidine versus conventional dexmedetomidine infusion for awake craniotomy A randomised clinical study

Dr Shagun Bhatia Shah1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2025年12月5日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
50
试验地点
1
主要终点
Pain Numeric Rating Scale

研究概览

简要总结

This prospective, interventional, parallel-arm, single-centric randomised controlled study aims to compare the effectiveness of the Hannivoort pharmacokinetic model for target-controlled infusion of dexmedetomidine with the conventional intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion for sedoanalgesia in patients undergoing awake craniotomy. It shall include 50 adult ASA I-II patients of either sex aged 18-70 years, weighing 45-80kg. Exclusion criteria comprise refusal to give consent, local anaesthetic allergy, raised intracranial pressure, bradyarrhythmias, and deranged hepatic function. The study shall be conducted at Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Delhi. The patients shall be randomly allocated to two groups: conventional dexmedetomidine infusion group (Group C; n = 25),  and target controlled infusion of dexmedetomidine group (Group T; n = 25). Our primary outcome measure would be the pain numeric rating scale (NRS), measured at the time of scalp block, urinary catheter placement, headpins application, skin incision, burr holes, dural incision, cortical mapping, tumour resection, dural closure and skin closure. Our secondary outcome measures shall be anxiety NRS, perfusion index, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, respiratory rate, bispectral index, and observer’s assessment of anxiety/sedation score measured at the above time points. We shall also measure the patient satisfaction score, clinician satisfaction score, and Trieger test score 30 minutes after completion of surgery.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 70.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status I/II patients, weighing 45-80 kg posted for awake craniotomy.

排除标准

  • Refusal to give consent, Local Anesthetic Allergy, Raised intracranial pressure, Bradyarrhythmia, Deranged liver function tests.

结局指标

主要结局

Pain Numeric Rating Scale

时间窗: T0 = Baseline | T1 = Scalp block | T2 = Urinary catheterization | T3 = Application of headpins and clamp | T4 = Skin Incision | T5 = Burr Holes | T6 = Dural Incision | T7 = Cortical Mapping | T8 = Tumour surgery | T9 = Dural Closure | T10 = Skin closure

次要结局

  • Perfusion Index(T0 = Baseline)
  • Anxiety Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score(T0 = Baseline)
  • Observers Assessment of alertness/sedation (OAS/S) score(T0 = Baseline)
  • Heart Rate(T0 = Baseline)
  • Mean Arterial Pressure(T0 = Baseline)
  • Respiratory rate(T0 = Baseline)
  • Bispectral index(T0 = Baseline)
  • Patient Satisfaction with Sedation Instrument (PSSI)
  • Clinician Satisfaction with Sedation Instrument (CSSI)
  • Trieger Test(30 min after surgery)

研究者

发起方
Dr Shagun Bhatia Shah
申办方类型
Other [self]
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr Shagun Bhatia Shah

Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Comparing two methods of sedation using the same... | 临床试验