POPE-Study: Phenotypes Of COPD in Central and Eastern Europe Study
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Sponsor
- Zuzana Zbožínková, M.Sc.
- Enrollment
- 3504
- Locations
- 79
- Primary Endpoint
- The distribution of COPD patients according to GOLD 2011 grades
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 10 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the representation of COPD patients in terms of categories and phenotypes of the disease in selected countries in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). The results of The POPE study will allow for evaluation of the differences in clinical approaches and treatment practices. The following countries are represented in The POPE study: Czech Republic, Slovakia, Austria, Poland, Hungary, Russia, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia, Estonia, Latvia and Bulgaria.
Detailed Description
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in Europe and a major consumer of resources in both primary and secondary healthcare (1,2). Both clinical features of disease severity and quality of COPD patient care may have substantial influence on disease outcomes. Traditionally, COPD has been categorized using the FEV1 (forced expiratory volume at one second ) - based GOLD (The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) classification . Other factors independently associated with survival include age, dyspnoea, health status, hyperinflation, gas exchange abnormalities, exacerbation frequency, exercise capacity, pulmonary hemodynamic, and nutritional status (3). Together these factors explain some of the existent heterogeneity within each GOLD stage in terms of symptoms, exacerbations, quality of life and exercise capacity (4). Recently, interest has emerged for the identification of clinical COPD phenotypes, as defined by ''a single or combination of disease attributes that describe difference between individuals with COPD as they relate to clinically meaningful outcomes'' (5). Many previous studies have attempted to identify and quantify the prevalence of different phenotypes of COPD using populations of various sources, severities, and particularities. Yet there is no consensus on the number and definition of different phenotypes. However, there must be a compromise between the oversimplification of the term COPD as a definition that encompasses the entire spectrum of patients with incompletely reversible airflow obstruction caused largely by smoking and the complexity of considering each patient individually as an orphan disease. The most frequently reported phenotypes are emphysema and chronic bronchitis, along with a subset of asthma sufferers. Recently, an extended list of proposed phenotypes have been proposed (6) including: (A) infrequent exacerbators with either chronic bronchitis or emphysema; (B) overlap COPD-asthma; (C) frequent exacerbators with emphysema predominant; and (D) frequent exacerbators with chronic bronchitis predominant. While there is consensus of substantial, but not complete, overlap among these phenotypes, the distribution of these phenotypes may differ widely between different countries and healthcare systems. Thus, the objectives of this study are to better understand the patient characteristics and treatment patterns of those diagnosed with COPD between different CEE countries. Knowledge of this information may provide insight into the variability of phenotypes between different healthcare systems and may subsequently contribute to a better understanding of the factors associated with patient outcomes and have the potential to improve the care of COPD patients.
Investigators
Zuzana Zbožínková, M.Sc.
project manager
Masaryk University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Age \> 40 years
- •Clinical diagnosis of COPD with post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC \< 0.7
- •Smoking burden ≥ 10 pack-years in smokers (group A). Evidence of exposure to at least one other typical inhaled COPD risk factor: environmental tobacco smoke, professional exposures, etc. (group B) Each country will include 300 COPD subjects with positive history of smoking (at least 10 pack-years). Consecutive non-smokers with COPD can be enrolled above this limit. Institute for Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University, Brno, The Czech Republic will analyze both COPD groups (A and B) separately
- •Stable disease for at least 4 weeks
- •Outpatient status
- •Informed Consent
Exclusion Criteria
- •Exacerbation of COPD and/or instable co-morbid condition
- •Patient during hospital stay for whatever reason (lung or co-morbidities)
- •Patient is not able and willing to participate
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
The distribution of COPD patients according to GOLD 2011 grades
Time Frame: 7 months
The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2011 classifies patients according to airflow limitation into four grades: GOLD1, Mild; GOLD 2, Moderate; GOLD 3, Severe; GOLD 4, Very severe
The distribution of COPD patients according to GOLD 2011 categories of risk (A. B, C, D)
Time Frame: 7 months
Secondary Outcomes
- The prevalence of surgical treatments in COPD patients(7 months)
- The prevalence various medication prescription(7 months)
- The prevalence of various COPD phenotypes(7 months)
- The prevalence of long term oxygen therapy use(7 months)
- The use of body plethysmography, bronchodilator test, carbon monoxide diffusing capacity testing, bronchial challenge test and FeNO test in ambulatory care(7 months)