Comparison of MAC Style Video Laryngoscope and MacIntosh Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation in a simulated difficult airway
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 110
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To compare the visualisation of the laryngeal inlet in the two groups
研究概览
简要总结
This Randomized single blinded comparative study aims to Compare between MAC style video Laryngoscope and MacIntosh Laryngoscope for Endotracheal intubation in a simulated difficult airway under General Anaesthesia.
A total of 110 Patients of ASA Grade I and II will be selected based on Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria aged between 18 to 65 years and will be randomly assigned into two groups ML and MV. Each group will have 55 Patients.
Group ML: Patients will be in intubated using MacIntosh Laryngoscope.
Group MV: Patients will be intubated using MAC Style Video Laryngoscope.
Primary Objective is to compare visualization of the Laryngeal inlet in the two groups.
Secondary objectives are to compare the intubation time in two groups, To compare the need for use of bougie or external laryngeal manipulation in the two groups, To compare overall intubation success rate in the two groups, To compare the complications in the two groups, to compare ease of intubation in the two groups
The study will be Conducted in Sharda Hospital, Greater Noida Over 18 Months.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 65.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Age between 18-65 years of either sex
- •ASA grade I and II
- •Elective surgery under general anaesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation
- •Patients willing to be part of the study
- •Patients having Airway Mallampati grade I or grade II
- •Patients with El-Ganzouri Risk Index Score less than or equals to 7
- •Patient having BMI less than 30 kg/m2.
排除标准
- •Patient refusal to participate in the study
- •Patient having any risk of gastric aspiration 3.Patients undergoing oropharyngeal surgery 4.Patient with known unstable cervical spine injury.
结局指标
主要结局
To compare the visualisation of the laryngeal inlet in the two groups
时间窗: Baseline
次要结局
- 1. To compare the intubation time in the two groups(2. To compare the need for use of bougie or external laryngeal manipulation in the two groups)
研究者
Dr Praveen kumar
School of medical sciences and research Sharda university