Comparison of the efficacy of non-needle and needle anesthesia (common dental anesthesia)
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Efficacy and acceptance of a new local anesthesia technique (needleless injection).
- Registration Number
- IRCT20191015045116N1
- Lead Sponsor
- Tehran University of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 25
Inclusion Criteria
Children aged 6 to 12 years.
These children have decayed primary molar on both sides of the maxilla.
These decayed primary molars require restorative treatment.
The repair of these decayed primary molars requires anesthesia.
Exclusion Criteria
children who are so uncooperative that the university refuses to accept them.
Children who have any systemic or infectious or viral diseases.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The pain and discomfort questionnaire (FLACC) is rated as 3 (0 1 2) as to whether the condition (face / legs / child activity / crying during injection and child sympathy). Timepoint: The FLACC questionnaire is filled in at the time of anesthesia injection and during the regenerative treatment. Method of measurement: The pain and discomfort questionnaire (FLACC) is rated as 3 (0 1 2) as to whether the condition (face / legs / child activity / crying during injection and child sympathy).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method