A Comparison of 4% Articaine Versus 0.5%Bupivacaine for Ambulatory Surgery Under Supraclavicular Block
Phase 1
Completed
- Conditions
- Upper Limb SurgeryHand Surgery
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT04189198
- Lead Sponsor
- Ain Shams University
- Brief Summary
Effect of 2%Articaine versus 5%bupivacaine in pt undergoing short duration surgery in upper limb
- Detailed Description
The investigator aim to compare Articaine 2% versus bupivacaine 0.5% in patient undergoing upper limb procedure under ultrasound guided supraclavicular block as regard onset and duration of sensory and motor block
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
Inclusion Criteria
- upper limb surgery
- ganglion removal
- k wiring
- Carapal tunnel
Exclusion Criteria
- Coagulopathy.
- infection at site of injection.
- patient refusal.
- hypersensitivity.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Articaine group Articaine Patients in this group are assigned to recieve 30 ml of Articaine 2% Bupivacaine Bupivacaine Patients in this group are assigned to recieve 30 ml of bupivacaine 0.5%
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Duration of analgesia Measured in minutes over 24 hours Measured by numerical analog scale where 0 no pain and 10 means worst pain
Duration of sensory block Measured in minutes over 24 hours By pinprick test from 0 to 2 where 0 no sensory block and 2 complete anesthesia
Durations of motor block Measured in minutes over 24 hours By Bromage scale from 1 to 4 where 1 no motor power and 4 full motor power
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Analgesia 24 hours First analgesia required
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Ain Shams University hosptal
🇪🇬Cairo, Abbasya, Egypt