Comparing two different techniques of nasal intubation.
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: 8- Other Procedures
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2020/12/029692
- Lead Sponsor
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 110
Inclusion Criteria
1 Patient scheduled for elective surgery requiring nasal intubation
2 American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1-2
Exclusion Criteria
1 Patient refusal
2 known difficult Airway
3 Patient with mouth opening <2.5cm
4 Patient difficult to mask ventilate
5 History of larynx surgery or larynx radiotherapy
6 Anticipated esophago-tracheal reflux
7 mallampati view 3 or 4
8 Frequent episodes of epistaxis or bleeding tendency
9 patients with significant systemic disease
10 Patient having Contraindications for NTI
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Primary outcome of our study is Time taken for ETT placement(defined as time taken after the confirmation of tip of endotracheal tube in nasopharynx by C-MAC video laryngoscope to the appearance of three successive end tidal CO2 waveforms.Timepoint: Primary outcome of our study is Time taken for ETT placement(defined as time taken after the confirmation of tip of endotracheal tube in nasopharynx by C-MAC video laryngoscope to the appearance of three successive end tidal CO2 waveforms by the end of 1 minute, beyond one minute attempt is considered a failure.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1 Type and number of manoeuvres (M1-M4) used <br/ ><br>2 Hemodynamic response to intubation <br/ ><br>3 Complication if anyTimepoint: Hemodynamic parameters SpO2,HR and BP measured at pre-op,1,2,3,4,5,10,15 minutes after intubation