MedPath

Everolimus, Temozolomide, and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme

Phase 1
Completed
Conditions
Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors
Interventions
Drug: concurrent RAD001 10 mg/day
Radiation: Radiation therapy
Drug: concurrent RAD001 2.5 mg/day
Drug: concurrent RAD001 5 mg/day
Drug: post-radiation RAD001 10 mg/day
Registration Number
NCT01062399
Lead Sponsor
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
Brief Summary

RATIONALE: Everolimus may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth and by blocking blood flow to the tumor. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as temozolomide, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Giving everolimus together with temozolomide and radiation therapy may kill more tumor cells.

PURPOSE: This phase I/II trial is studying the side effects and best dose of everolimus when given together with temozolomide and radiation therapy and to see how well it works in treating patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme.

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

* To define the maximum tolerated dose of everolimus (up to an established dose of 10 mg/day) when combined with concurrent radiotherapy and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. (Phase I)

* To determine the efficacy of everolimus in combination with radiotherapy and temozolomide followed by adjuvant everolimus in combination with temozolomide, as measured by progression-free survival, in these patients. (Phase II)

Secondary

* To characterize the safety profile of everolimus in combination with radiotherapy and temozolomide in these patients. (Phase I)

* To determine the overall survival of these patients. (Phase II)

* To further evaluate the safety profile of everolimus in combination with radiotherapy and temozolomide in these patients. (Phase II)

* To determine if activation of the Akt/mTOR axis predicts response to everolimus. (Phase II)

* To determine if there is an association between tumor MGMT gene methylation status and response to everolimus. (Phase II)

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, phase I, dose-escalation study of everolimus followed by a phase II, randomized study.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 1 year, every 4 months for 1 year, and then every 6 months thereafter.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
279
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Ph I: RT + TMZ + RAD001 2.5 mg/dayRadiation therapyRadiation therapy (RT), concurrent temozolomide (TMZ), and concurrent RAD001 2.5 mg/day followed by post-radiation temozolomide and post-radiation RAD001 10 mg/day.
Ph I: RT + TMZ + RAD001 2.5 mg/dayconcurrent RAD001 2.5 mg/dayRadiation therapy (RT), concurrent temozolomide (TMZ), and concurrent RAD001 2.5 mg/day followed by post-radiation temozolomide and post-radiation RAD001 10 mg/day.
Ph I: RT + TMZ + RAD001 2.5 mg/daypost-radiation RAD001 10 mg/dayRadiation therapy (RT), concurrent temozolomide (TMZ), and concurrent RAD001 2.5 mg/day followed by post-radiation temozolomide and post-radiation RAD001 10 mg/day.
Ph I: RT + TMZ + RAD001 5 mg/dayRadiation therapyRadiation therapy, concurrent temozolomide, and concurrent RAD001 5 mg/day followed by post-radiation temozolomide and post-radiation RAD001 10 mg/day.
Ph I: RT + TMZ + RAD001 5 mg/dayconcurrent RAD001 5 mg/dayRadiation therapy, concurrent temozolomide, and concurrent RAD001 5 mg/day followed by post-radiation temozolomide and post-radiation RAD001 10 mg/day.
Ph I: RT + TMZ + RAD001 5 mg/daypost-radiation RAD001 10 mg/dayRadiation therapy, concurrent temozolomide, and concurrent RAD001 5 mg/day followed by post-radiation temozolomide and post-radiation RAD001 10 mg/day.
Ph I: RT + TMZ + RAD001 10 mg/dayconcurrent RAD001 10 mg/dayRadiation therapy, concurrent temozolomide, and concurrent RAD001 10 mg/day followed by post-radiation temozolomide and post-radiation RAD001 10 mg/day.
Ph I: RT + TMZ + RAD001 10 mg/dayRadiation therapyRadiation therapy, concurrent temozolomide, and concurrent RAD001 10 mg/day followed by post-radiation temozolomide and post-radiation RAD001 10 mg/day.
Ph I: RT + TMZ + RAD001 10 mg/daypost-radiation RAD001 10 mg/dayRadiation therapy, concurrent temozolomide, and concurrent RAD001 10 mg/day followed by post-radiation temozolomide and post-radiation RAD001 10 mg/day.
Ph II: RT + TMZconcurrent temozolomideRadiation therapy and concurrent temozolomide followed by post-radiation temozolomide
Ph II: RT + TMZRadiation therapyRadiation therapy and concurrent temozolomide followed by post-radiation temozolomide
Ph II: RT + TMZpost-radiation RAD001 10 mg/dayRadiation therapy and concurrent temozolomide followed by post-radiation temozolomide
Ph II: RT + TMZ + RAD001concurrent RAD001 10 mg/dayRadiation therapy, concurrent temozolomide, and concurrent RAD001 10 mg/day followed by post-radiation temozolomide and post-radiation RAD001 10 mg/day.
Ph II: RT + TMZ + RAD001Radiation therapyRadiation therapy, concurrent temozolomide, and concurrent RAD001 10 mg/day followed by post-radiation temozolomide and post-radiation RAD001 10 mg/day.
Ph II: RT + TMZ + RAD001post-radiation RAD001 10 mg/dayRadiation therapy, concurrent temozolomide, and concurrent RAD001 10 mg/day followed by post-radiation temozolomide and post-radiation RAD001 10 mg/day.
Ph II: RT + TMZ + RAD001post-radiation temozolomideRadiation therapy, concurrent temozolomide, and concurrent RAD001 10 mg/day followed by post-radiation temozolomide and post-radiation RAD001 10 mg/day.
Ph I: RT + TMZ + RAD001 2.5 mg/dayconcurrent temozolomideRadiation therapy (RT), concurrent temozolomide (TMZ), and concurrent RAD001 2.5 mg/day followed by post-radiation temozolomide and post-radiation RAD001 10 mg/day.
Ph I: RT + TMZ + RAD001 2.5 mg/daypost-radiation temozolomideRadiation therapy (RT), concurrent temozolomide (TMZ), and concurrent RAD001 2.5 mg/day followed by post-radiation temozolomide and post-radiation RAD001 10 mg/day.
Ph I: RT + TMZ + RAD001 5 mg/dayconcurrent temozolomideRadiation therapy, concurrent temozolomide, and concurrent RAD001 5 mg/day followed by post-radiation temozolomide and post-radiation RAD001 10 mg/day.
Ph I: RT + TMZ + RAD001 5 mg/daypost-radiation temozolomideRadiation therapy, concurrent temozolomide, and concurrent RAD001 5 mg/day followed by post-radiation temozolomide and post-radiation RAD001 10 mg/day.
Ph I: RT + TMZ + RAD001 10 mg/dayconcurrent temozolomideRadiation therapy, concurrent temozolomide, and concurrent RAD001 10 mg/day followed by post-radiation temozolomide and post-radiation RAD001 10 mg/day.
Ph I: RT + TMZ + RAD001 10 mg/daypost-radiation temozolomideRadiation therapy, concurrent temozolomide, and concurrent RAD001 10 mg/day followed by post-radiation temozolomide and post-radiation RAD001 10 mg/day.
Ph II: RT + TMZpost-radiation temozolomideRadiation therapy and concurrent temozolomide followed by post-radiation temozolomide
Ph II: RT + TMZ + RAD001concurrent temozolomideRadiation therapy, concurrent temozolomide, and concurrent RAD001 10 mg/day followed by post-radiation temozolomide and post-radiation RAD001 10 mg/day.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Phase I: Number of Patients With Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)From start of treatment to eight weeks.

DLT is defined as any of the following events occurring during the first 8 weeks of treatment with RAD001 and temozolomide and attributable to the study drugs: any grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia, grade 4 anemia, or grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than 7 days; any non-hematologic grade 3 or greater adverse event (AE), excluding alopecia, despite maximal medical therapy; any grade 4 radiation-induced skin changes; failure to recover from adverse events to be eligible for re-treatment with RAD001 and temozolomide within 14 days of the last dose of either drug; or any episode of non-infectious pneumonitis grade 2, 3, or 4 of any duration. Adverse events are graded using CTCAE v4.0. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE v4.0 assigns Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild AE, Grade 2 Moderate AE, Grade 3 Severe AE, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling AE, Grade 5 Death related to AE

Phase II: Progression-free Survival (PFS)Analysis occured after 134 events (progression or death) were reported. Patients were followed from randomization to death or study termination whichever occurs first, up to 36.7 months.

Using the Response Assessment in Neuro- Oncology (RANO) criteria, the progression is defined by any of the following: \> 25% increase in sum of the products of perpendicular diameters of enhancing lesions compared to the smallest tumor measurement obtained either at baseline (if no decrease) or best response, on stable or increasing doses of corticosteroids; Significant increase in T2/FLAIR non-enhancing lesion on stable or increasing doses of corticosteroids compared to baseline scan or best response following initiation of therapy, not due to co-morbid events; Any new lesion; Clear clinical deterioration not attributable to other causes apart from the tumor or changes in corticosteroid dose; Failure to return for evaluation due to death or deteriorating condition; Clear progression of non-measurable disease. PFS time is defined as time from registration to date of progression, death, or last known follow-up (censored). PFS rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Phase II: Overall Survival (OS)Analysis occured after 134 events (progression or death) were reported. Patients were followed from randomization to death or study termination whichever occurs first, up to 36.7 months.

Overall survival time is defined as time from/randomization to the date of death from any cause and is estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients last known to be alive are censored at the date of last contact.

Phase I: Distribution of Worst Adverse Event GradeAnalysis occured after 134 events (progression or death) were reported. Patients were followed from randomization to death or study termination whichever occurs first, up to 36.7 months.

AE reporting in Phase I was split up by treatment timing: concurrent treatment (RT, TMZ, RAD001); post-RT treatment (TMZ, RAD001) along with all AE's reported in follow-up.

The worst/highest grade of any adverse event reported in each time period was determined for each patient. The percentage of patients in each grade level is reported. Adverse events are graded using CTCAE v4.0. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE v4.0 assigns Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild AE, Grade 2 Moderate AE, Grade 3 Severe AE, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling AE, Grade 5 Death related to AE.

Phase II: Distribution of Worst Adverse Event GradeAnalysis occured after 134 events (progression or death) were reported. Patients were followed from randomization to death or study termination whichever occurs first, up to 36.7 months.

The worst/highest grade of any adverse event reported was determined for each patient. The percentage of patients in each grade level is reported. Adverse events are graded using CTCAE v4.0. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE v4.0 assigns Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild AE, Grade 2 Moderate AE, Grade 3 Severe AE, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling AE, Grade 5 Death related to AE.

Trial Locations

Locations (36)

St. Barnabas Medical Center Cancer Center

🇺🇸

Livingston, New Jersey, United States

Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University

🇺🇸

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

St. Agnes Hospital Cancer Center

🇺🇸

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

St. Vincent Oncology Center

🇺🇸

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center

🇺🇸

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

🇺🇸

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Flagler Cancer Center

🇺🇸

Saint Augustine, Florida, United States

Summa Center for Cancer Care at Akron City Hospital

🇺🇸

Akron, Ohio, United States

Regional Cancer Center at Singing River Hospital

🇺🇸

Pascagoula, Mississippi, United States

Rhode Island Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center

🇺🇸

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Huntsman Cancer Institute at University of Utah

🇺🇸

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center

🇺🇸

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

CCOP - Christiana Care Health Services

🇺🇸

Newark, Delaware, United States

University of Florida Shands Cancer Center

🇺🇸

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Baptist Cancer Institute - Jacksonville

🇺🇸

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Integrated Community Oncology Network

🇺🇸

Jacksonville Beach, Florida, United States

Integrated Community Oncology Network at Southside Cancer Center

🇺🇸

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Baptist Medical Center South

🇺🇸

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Integrated Community Oncology Network - Orange Park

🇺🇸

Orange Park, Florida, United States

Florida Cancer Center - Palatka

🇺🇸

Palatka, Florida, United States

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute at University of South Florida

🇺🇸

Tampa, Florida, United States

University Radiation Oncology at Parkridge Hospital

🇺🇸

Rochester, New York, United States

New York Oncology Hematology, PC at Albany Regional Cancer Care

🇺🇸

Albany, New York, United States

Blumenthal Cancer Center at Carolinas Medical Center

🇺🇸

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

James P. Wilmot Cancer Center at University of Rochester Medical Center

🇺🇸

Rochester, New York, United States

Barberton Citizens Hospital

🇺🇸

Barberton, Ohio, United States

Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center

🇺🇸

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Willamette Valley Cancer Center - Eugene

🇺🇸

Eugene, Oregon, United States

Cherry Tree Cancer Center

🇺🇸

Hanover, Pennsylvania, United States

McGlinn Family Regional Cancer Center at Reading Hospital and Medical Center

🇺🇸

Reading, Pennsylvania, United States

York Cancer Center at Apple Hill Medical Center

🇺🇸

York, Pennsylvania, United States

Waukesha Memorial Hospital Regional Cancer Center

🇺🇸

Waukesha, Wisconsin, United States

Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

🇮🇱

Tel Aviv, Israel

Ottawa Hospital Regional Cancer Centre - General Campus

🇨🇦

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Adams Cancer Center

🇺🇸

Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, United States

Tyler Cancer Center

🇺🇸

Tyler, Texas, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath