COMPARISON OF HARD AND SOFT TISSUE CHANGES OF EXTRACTION SOCKET PRESERVED WITH BONE GRAFT AND MEMBRANE VS. SPONTANEOUS HEALING OF THE SOCKET.
- Conditions
- Other and unspecified diseases ofpulp and periapical tissues,pateint should not having any chronic medical condition that may affect the bone condition.
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/06/053851
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr RAJESH SAHU
- Brief Summary
The AIM of my study is To evaluate the hard and soft tissue changes of extraction sockets with and without ridge preservation using indigenously prepared DFDBA &amnion chorion membrane (ACM). The study will comprise of 24 adult subjects of either sex with single rooted teeth having normal adjacent tooth on either side ,of either jaw, as defined in the inclusion criteria and agree to sign the informed consent.The subjects will be recruited from the Outpatient Department of Periodontics at Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences.
Test group- Socket preservation with DFDBA block graft and amnion chorion membrane.
After atraumatic extraction of the tooth the socket will be preserved using DFDBA bone graft and Amnion-chorion membrane .The subjects will be recalled after a period of 6 months for evaluation of the hard and the soft tissue changes of the extraction socket and comparing it with unassisted healing of the socket.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 24
- Subjects of either sex between the age group of 18-55 years, who are willing to sign informed consent form for the study.
- 2.Subjects in whom extraction is indicated in single rooted tooth in maxilla and /or mandible with intact adjacent teeth for stent fabrication and placement.
- 3.Clinical root length/residual socket depth should be >8 mm.
- 4.To select only sites where the tooth location and root angulation is consistent with the ideal implant orientation where inter-occlusal distance is adequate for a dental implant placement.
- Teeth adjacent to extraction socket having any periapical and/or active periodontal disease.
- Pregnant women and/or expected pregnancy during the study period.
- lactating women.
- smokers smoking more than 10 cigarrete per day.
- subjects under long term bisphosphponate therapy.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The test sites expected to show a better preservation of width and thickness of keratinized tissue when compared to control sites. AT BASE LINE AND 6 MONTHS The horizontal bone resorption at the test sites expected to be 1.6 ± 0.55 mm less as compared to control group. AT BASE LINE AND 6 MONTHS The vertical bone resorption at the test sites expected to be 1.1± 0.5 mm less as compared to test group. AT BASE LINE AND 6 MONTHS
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The control sites are expected to require an additional bone augmentation at implant placement, when compared to the test sites. Test sites are expected to allows the placement of longer and wider implants when compared to implants inserted in control sites .
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Maulana azad institute of dental sciences
🇮🇳Delhi, DELHI, India
Maulana azad institute of dental sciences🇮🇳Delhi, DELHI, IndiaDr RAJESH SAHUPrincipal investigator7011826669sahu9168448@gmail.com