Extraction Socket Management Using Connective Tissue Graft Versus Mucograft®
- Conditions
- Tooth Lost
- Registration Number
- NCT02753153
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Liege
- Brief Summary
This study aims at assessing the hard and soft tissues remodelling of the alveolar crest after extraction socket managements in the aesthetic areas:
* 3D radiographic evaluation (CT scan) was performed post extraction and 3 months after at the time of implant placement. (Outcomes 1: Hard tissues analyses )
* Impressions, models and 3D analyses of the treated area allowed studying external soft tissue remodeling at different time points after extraction. (Outcomes 2: Soft tissues analyses )
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 14
- Patients needing an extraction in the aesthetic area to be replace with an implant (incisive, canine or premolar)
- Good general health (ASA 1, 2)
- Controlled periodontitis
- No age restriction
- Extraction socket with buccal bone defect / buccal bone wall dehiscence
- Smokers > 10 cigarettes per day
- Immune system disease
- Bone disease or treatment by medicines interfering with bone metabolism
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Bone remodeling of the buccal and palatal walls using radiographic measurements 1year Bone remodeling of the buccal and palatal walls will be measured in cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) on the day of extraction, at 3 months after implant placement.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Soft tissue contours measurements by 3D image analyses. 6months Models from the different time points are scanned using 3D-Laser-Scanner and Software (Metalor). 3D reconstructions are matched in order to evaluate 3D and 2D volume changes in extraction sites from baseline to implant placement.