MedPath

Female Teacher's Voice During Teaching

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Functional Voice Disorder
Registration Number
NCT03382535
Lead Sponsor
University of Oulu
Brief Summary

Two voice therapy methods are compared. Activity noise levels and vocal load of teachers during teaching in primary school classrooms are evaluated. Acoustic and Workshop Interventions are implemented in order to reduce noise level during lesson.

Detailed Description

Due to the voice disorders, teachers are a major customer group for voice therapy. The main part of the study is comparison of two voice therapy methods.

There are several factors in the classroom that increase teacher's risk of voice disorders. One of the most significant is high noise level during lessons. This study explores the noise conditions the teachers are working in and how these conditions are related to the voice parameters and symptoms.

Finally, the study aims to determine whether classroom noise level can be lowered by improving classroom acoustics and by noise reducing workshops for teachers and pupils.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
54
Inclusion Criteria
  • Female teachers or teachers of special needs children from elementary schools
  • Voice symptoms and willingness to participate in voice therapy
  • Mother tongue Finnish
  • No hearing loss, no need to use a hearing aid
  • Non-smoking
  • No neurological diseases
  • No voice therapy during past year
  • Successful phoniatric examination with rigid laryngoscopy or nasal endoscopy
Exclusion Criteria
  • Mother tongue other than Finnish
  • Need to use a hearing aid
  • Need for medical treatment in the larynx
  • Abnormalities of the larynx
  • Vocal cord paresis
  • Laryngitis
  • Posterior hypertrophy

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The change of the well-being of the teachers' voice.Up to one week before the interventions, up to one week after the interventions, 6 months after the interventions, 1 year and 2 years after the interventions and up to one week after the control time (concerning control group).

Subjective evaluation.Data collected with a questionnaire (Voice Activity and Participation Profile, VAPP) from the participants, answers given on a visual analogical scale (VAS) of 100 mm (0 = no disorder, 100 = extreme disorder).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.